Suppr超能文献

干扰电流载波频率对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者疼痛调节和中枢性高敏反应的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。

Effects of the carrier frequency of interferential current on pain modulation and central hypersensitivity in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Corrêa J B, Costa L O P, Oliveira N T B, Lima W P, Sluka K A, Liebano R E

机构信息

Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov;20(10):1653-1666. doi: 10.1002/ejp.889. Epub 2016 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interferential current (IFC) is commonly used for pain relief, but the effects of carrier frequency of the current and its action on pain mechanisms remain unclear. This randomized placebo-controlled trial tested the effects of IFC in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty participants were randomly allocated into three groups: 1 kHz, 4 kHz and placebo. The primary outcomes were pain intensity at rest in the first session (immediate effect of the IFC), after 12 sessions, 4 months after randomization (follow-up) and during movement (first and last session). The secondary outcomes were disability, global perceived effect, functional performance, discomfort caused by the IFC, use of analgesics and physiological measures of pain.

RESULTS

Only during the first session, there was a significant decrease in pain intensity in the active groups. However, there were no differences in the improvement of pain at rest or during movement in the active groups compared to the placebo group in the remaining sessions. The frequency use of analgesics was significantly decreased in the active groups. For pain physiology measures, there was a significant increase in pressure pain thresholds in both active groups compared to the placebo group and a reduction in the temporal summation in the 1 kHz group compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that although the IFC has changed some physiological mechanisms of pain and showed decrease frequency use of pain medication, there was no change in the primary aim, pain intensity. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?: The interferential current (IFC) presented advantages in the physiological measures of pain and showed decrease frequency use of pain medication. Future studies should investigate analgesic intake with IFC treatment.

摘要

背景

干扰电流(IFC)常用于缓解疼痛,但电流载波频率的影响及其对疼痛机制的作用仍不清楚。这项随机安慰剂对照试验测试了IFC对慢性非特异性下背痛患者的影响。

方法

150名参与者被随机分为三组:1千赫、4千赫和安慰剂组。主要结局指标为首次治疗时(IFC的即时效应)、12次治疗后、随机分组后4个月(随访)以及运动期间(首次和末次治疗)的静息疼痛强度。次要结局指标包括残疾程度、整体感觉效果、功能表现、IFC引起的不适、镇痛药的使用情况以及疼痛的生理指标。

结果

仅在首次治疗时,活跃组的疼痛强度显著降低。然而,在其余治疗中,与安慰剂组相比,活跃组在静息或运动时疼痛改善方面并无差异。活跃组镇痛药的使用频率显著降低。在疼痛生理指标方面,与安慰剂组相比,两个活跃组的压力痛阈值均显著升高,且与其他组相比,1千赫组的时间总和降低。

结论

这些结果表明,尽管IFC改变了一些疼痛的生理机制并显示出疼痛药物使用频率降低,但主要目标,即疼痛强度并无变化。本研究有何新发现?干扰电流(IFC)在疼痛的生理指标方面具有优势,并显示出疼痛药物使用频率降低。未来的研究应调查IFC治疗时的镇痛药摄入量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验