Sampsonis Thomas, Karanasios Stefanos, Gioftsos George
Physiotherapy Department, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Aigaleo, Greece.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;13(14):1719. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141719.
Manual therapy techniques, including mobilization and manipulation, are commonly used for chronic low back pain (CLBP), with clinical guidelines recommending their use. This study aimed to compare the immediate hypoalgesic effects of mobilization and manipulation in patients with non-specific CLBP, evaluating their impact on pain sensitivity and range of motion. A cross-over randomized controlled trial was conducted with 27 participants with non-specific CLBP. Participants received either mobilization or manipulation on two different intervention days. Outcome measures included pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) assessed with a digital algometer, pain intensity using a numeric rating scale, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) measured with a digital inclinometer. The results indicated no statistically significant differences between mobilization and manipulation for any outcome measures (all > 0.05). However, significant within-intervention improvements were observed, including pain reduction, increased PPTs, and enhanced ROM of the lower back. Our findings suggest that both mobilization and manipulation provide similar immediate benefits for patients with CLBP. The choice between these techniques should be based on therapists' clinical reasoning and individualized risk stratification, considering the potential benefits and risks of each approach for a specific patient.
手法治疗技术,包括松动术和整复术,常用于慢性下腰痛(CLBP),临床指南也推荐使用这些技术。本研究旨在比较非特异性CLBP患者中松动术和整复术的即时镇痛效果,评估它们对疼痛敏感性和活动范围的影响。对27名非特异性CLBP患者进行了一项交叉随机对照试验。参与者在两个不同的干预日分别接受了松动术或整复术。结果测量包括使用数字式痛觉计评估的压力疼痛阈值(PPTs)、使用数字评分量表评估的疼痛强度,以及使用数字倾角仪测量的腰椎活动范围(ROM)。结果表明,在任何结果测量中,松动术和整复术之间均无统计学显著差异(均P>0.05)。然而,在干预过程中观察到了显著改善,包括疼痛减轻、PPTs增加以及下背部ROM增加。我们的研究结果表明,松动术和整复术对CLBP患者都能提供相似的即时益处。在这些技术之间的选择应基于治疗师的临床推理和个体化风险分层,同时考虑每种方法对特定患者的潜在益处和风险。