Suppr超能文献

干扰治疗参数组合对慢性下腰痛的即刻影响:一项随机对照试验。

Immediate Effects of the Combination of Interferential Therapy Parameters on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Prevention and Rehabilitation in Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.

Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2020 Jul;20(6):615-625. doi: 10.1111/papr.12888. Epub 2020 May 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the immediate analgesic effects of 2 kHz or 4 kHz interferential current (IFC) with different amplitude-modulated frequencies (AMFs) (2 Hz or 100 Hz) on chronic low back pain (CLBP).

DESIGN

Three-arm double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

175 patients (19 to 60 years of age, 105 female) with CLBP.

INTERVENTIONS

One session of IFC: Interferential group (GI): GI2 kHz/100 Hz, GI2 kHz/2 Hz, GI4  kHz/100 Hz, GI4 kHz/2 Hz, or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Pain intensity by numerical rating scale of pain (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and algometry.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in NRS scores (P < 0.05) in the GI2 kHz/2 Hz, GI4 kHz/2 Hz, and GI4 kHz/100 Hz groups compared with those of the placebo group (PG), and a significant difference in MPQ scores in the GI4 kHz/2 Hz and GI4 kHz/100 Hz groups compared with those of the PG. In algometry, only the GI4 kHz/100 Hz group showed a significant difference (by 2 points in the lumbar region) compared with the PG. Of the carrier frequencies, an IFC of 4 kHz showed more effective results, although no significant difference was noted between the AMFs.

CONCLUSION

An IFC with a carrier frequency of 4 kHz and an AMF of 100 Hz provide immediate analgesic effects in individuals with CLBP.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

RBR-59YGRB.

摘要

目的

比较 2 kHz 或 4 kHz 干扰电流(IFC)与不同幅度调制频率(AMF)(2 Hz 或 100 Hz)对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的即时镇痛效果。

设计

三臂双盲随机对照试验。

设置

初级保健。

参与者

175 名 CLBP 患者(19 至 60 岁,105 名女性)。

干预措施

IFC 治疗 1 次:干扰组(GI):GI2 kHz/100 Hz、GI2 kHz/2 Hz、GI4 kHz/100 Hz、GI4 kHz/2 Hz 或安慰剂。

主要结局测量

数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)、麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)和压痛测量的疼痛强度。

结果

与 PG 相比,GI2 kHz/2 Hz、GI4 kHz/2 Hz 和 GI4 kHz/100 Hz 组的 NRS 评分有显著差异(P<0.05),与 PG 相比,GI4 kHz/2 Hz 和 GI4 kHz/100 Hz 组的 MPQ 评分有显著差异。在压痛测量中,只有 GI4 kHz/100 Hz 组与 PG 相比有显著差异(腰部增加 2 分)。在载波频率方面,4 kHz 的 IFC 显示出更有效的效果,尽管 AMF 之间没有显著差异。

结论

4 kHz 载波频率和 100 Hz AMF 的 IFC 可立即缓解 CLBP 患者的疼痛。

临床试验注册号

RBR-59YGRB。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验