Bekker Sheree, Finch Caroline F
Australian Collaboration for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention (ACRISP), Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e010877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010877.
The field of sport injury prevention has seen a marked increase in published research in recent years, with concomitant proliferation of lay sport safety resources, such as policies, fact sheets and posters. The aim of this study was to catalogue and categorise the number, type and topic focus of sport safety resources from a representative set of key organisations.
Cataloguing and qualitative document analysis of resources available from the websites of six stakeholder organisations in Australia.
This study was part of a larger investigation, the National Guidance for Australian Football Partnerships and Safety (NoGAPS) project.
The NoGAPS study provided the context for a purposive sampling of six organisations involved in the promotion of safety in Australian football. These partners are recognised as being highly representative of organisations at national and state level that reflect similarly in their goals around sport safety promotion in Australia.
The catalogue comprised 284 resources. More of the practical and less prescriptive types of resources, such as fact sheets, than formal policies were found. Resources for the prevention of physical injuries were the predominant sport safety issue addressed, with risk management, environmental issues and social behaviours comprising other categories. Duplication of resources for specific safety issues, within and across organisations, was found.
People working within sport settings have access to a proliferation of resources, which creates a potential rivalry for sourcing of injury prevention information. Important issues that are likely to influence the uptake of safety advice by the general sporting public include the sheer number of resources available, and the overlap and duplication of resources addressing the same issues. The existence of a large number of resources from reputable organisations does not mean that they are necessarily evidence based, fully up to date or even effective in supporting sport safety behaviour change.
近年来,运动损伤预防领域的已发表研究显著增加,同时诸如政策、情况说明书和海报等大众运动安全资源也大量涌现。本研究的目的是对一系列具有代表性的关键组织的运动安全资源的数量、类型和主题重点进行编目和分类。
对澳大利亚六个利益相关者组织网站上的可用资源进行编目和定性文献分析。
本研究是一项更大规模调查“澳大利亚足球伙伴关系与安全国家指南”(NoGAPS)项目的一部分。
NoGAPS研究为有目的地抽样选取六个参与推广澳大利亚足球安全的组织提供了背景。这些合作伙伴被认为是国家和州层面组织的高度代表,它们在澳大利亚围绕运动安全推广的目标上具有相似性。
该目录包含284份资源。发现实用型资源(如情况说明书)比正式政策更多,规定性更弱。预防身体损伤的资源是主要涉及的运动安全问题,风险管理、环境问题和社会行为构成其他类别。发现组织内部和组织之间存在针对特定安全问题的资源重复情况。
在运动环境中工作的人员可以获取大量资源,这为获取预防损伤信息带来了潜在竞争。可能影响广大体育公众接受安全建议的重要问题包括可用资源的数量庞大,以及针对相同问题的资源重叠和重复。来自知名组织的大量资源的存在并不意味着它们一定基于证据、完全最新,甚至在支持运动安全行为改变方面有效。