Ching Terence H W, Tang Catherine S, Wu Anise, Yan Elsie
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, National University of Singapore , Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau , Macau, China.
J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):342-50. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.025. Epub 2016 May 9.
Background and aims The addictive nature of compulsive buying implies that mood disturbances, stress, and cognitive biases that underlie compulsive buying might operate in ways similar in both genders. In the current study, we aimed to test hypothetical pathways of mood compensation and irrational cognitions, which may explain compulsive buying tendencies. We also examined potential gender differences in these pathways. Methods Two-hundred and thirty-two male (age: M = 20.30, SD = 1.74) and 373 female Chinese college students (age: M = 19.97, SD = 1.74) in Hong Kong and Macau completed measures assessing compulsive buying, psychological distress, avoidance coping, materialism, and buying-related cognitions. Mediation analyses via a structural equation modeling approach explained by Cheung (2007, 2009) were conducted, with gender as a grouping variable. Results There was a gender difference in the mood compensation pathway; avoidance coping partially mediated the link between psychological distress and compulsive buying severity in females only. On the other hand, the irrational cognitive pathway, in which irrational buying-related cognitions fully mediated the link between materialism and compulsive buying severity, was supported for both genders. There was no gender difference in the extent of mediation within the irrational cognitive pathway, and the mediation effect within the irrational cognitive pathway was larger than that within the mood compensation pathway for both genders. Conclusions Mood compensation processes in compulsive buying might be female specific, and secondary to irrational cognitions, which were gender invariant. Gender-dependent mechanisms and irrational cognitions should be emphasized in compulsive buying treatment.
背景与目的 强迫性购物的成瘾本质意味着,作为强迫性购物基础的情绪困扰、压力和认知偏差在男女两性中可能以相似的方式起作用。在本研究中,我们旨在检验情绪补偿和非理性认知的假设路径,这些路径可能解释强迫性购物倾向。我们还研究了这些路径中潜在的性别差异。方法 香港和澳门的232名男性(年龄:M = 20.30,标准差 = 1.74)和373名女性中国大学生(年龄:M = 19.97,标准差 = 1.74)完成了评估强迫性购物、心理困扰、回避应对、物质主义和与购物相关认知的测量。采用由Cheung(2007年,2009年)解释的结构方程建模方法进行中介分析,以性别作为分组变量。结果 在情绪补偿路径上存在性别差异;回避应对仅在女性中部分中介了心理困扰与强迫性购物严重程度之间的联系。另一方面,非理性认知路径,即与购物相关的非理性认知完全中介了物质主义与强迫性购物严重程度之间的联系,在两性中均得到支持。在非理性认知路径内的中介程度上没有性别差异,并且在非理性认知路径内的中介效应在两性中均大于情绪补偿路径内的中介效应。结论 强迫性购物中的情绪补偿过程可能是女性特有的,且继发于非理性认知,而非理性认知在性别上是不变的。在强迫性购物治疗中应强调性别依赖性机制和非理性认知。