• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过按键级建模预测总视线离开道路时间来评估驾驶时车内信息系统的注意力分散情况。

Evaluating distraction of in-vehicle information systems while driving by predicting total eyes-off-road times with keystroke level modeling.

作者信息

Purucker Christian, Naujoks Frederik, Prill Andy, Neukum Alexandra

机构信息

Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences (WIVW GmbH), Germany.

Hyundai Motor Europe Technical Center GmbH (HMETC GmbH), Germany.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:543-554. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.012
PMID:27157271
Abstract

Increasingly complex in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) have become available in the automotive vehicle interior. To ensure usability and safety of use while driving, the distraction potential of system-associated tasks is most often analyzed during the development process, either by employing empirical or analytical methods, with both families of methods offering certain advantages and disadvantages. The present paper introduces a method that combines the predictive precision of empirical methods with the economic advantages of analytical methods. Keystroke level modeling (KLM) was extended to a task-dependent modeling procedure for total eyes-off-road times (TEORT) resulting from system use while driving and demonstrated by conducting two subsequent simulator studies. The first study involved the operation of an IVIS by N = 18 participants. The results suggest a good model fit (R(2)Adj. = 0.67) for predicting the TEORT, relying on regressors from KLM and participant age. Using the parameter estimates from study 1, the predictive validity of the model was successfully tested during a second study with N = 14 participants using a version of the IVIS prototype with a revised design and task structure (rPred.-Obs. = 0.58). Possible applications and shortcomings of the approach are discussed.

摘要

越来越复杂的车载信息系统(IVIS)已出现在汽车内饰中。为确保驾驶时使用的可用性和安全性,在开发过程中通常会分析系统相关任务的潜在干扰性,要么采用实证方法,要么采用分析方法,这两类方法都有一定的优缺点。本文介绍了一种将实证方法的预测精度与分析方法的经济优势相结合的方法。按键级建模(KLM)被扩展为一种依赖任务的建模程序,用于计算驾驶时使用系统导致的总视线离开道路时间(TEORT),并通过进行两项后续模拟器研究进行了演示。第一项研究涉及18名参与者操作IVIS。结果表明,依靠KLM的回归变量和参与者年龄来预测TEORT时,模型拟合良好(调整后R² = 0.67)。利用研究1的参数估计值,在第二项研究中,对14名参与者使用具有修订设计和任务结构的IVIS原型版本成功测试了模型的预测有效性(预测值与观测值的相关性r = 0.58)。讨论了该方法的可能应用和缺点。

相似文献

1
Evaluating distraction of in-vehicle information systems while driving by predicting total eyes-off-road times with keystroke level modeling.通过按键级建模预测总视线离开道路时间来评估驾驶时车内信息系统的注意力分散情况。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:543-554. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 May 6.
2
Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China.评估用于支持车载触摸屏人机界面的辅助输入设备:在英国和中国进行的跨文化模拟器研究。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:184-196. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
So what really is user experience? An experimental study of user needs and emotional responses as underlying constructs.那么用户体验究竟是什么?一项关于作为潜在结构的用户需求和情感反应的实验研究。
Ergonomics. 2017 Dec;60(12):1601-1620. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1341555. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.驾驶模拟评估车内信息界面差异的有效性:与现场测试的比较。
Ergonomics. 2010 Mar;53(3):404-20. doi: 10.1080/00140130903464358.
5
Evaluation of Gesture-Based In-Vehicle Interaction: User Experience and the Potential to Reduce Driver Distraction.基于手势的车载交互评估:用户体验和减少驾驶员分心的潜力。
Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):774-792. doi: 10.1177/0018720818824253. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.向分心驾驶的司机提供实时反馈的安全影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 May;39(3):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
7
Redesigning Today's Driving Automation Toward Adaptive Backup Control With Context-Based and Invisible Interfaces.面向基于上下文和不可见界面的自适应备份控制的今日驾驶自动化重新设计。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):211-228. doi: 10.1177/0018720819894757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Virtual prototyping and testing of in-vehicle interfaces.车载界面的虚拟原型设计与测试。
Ergonomics. 2003 Jan 15;46(1-3):41-51. doi: 10.1080/00140130303528.
9
The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation.路面运动对 BMS 触摸屏设备操作的影响。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):986-96. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.685496. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Modelling the hare and the tortoise: predicting the range of in-vehicle task times using critical path analysis.模拟龟兔赛跑:运用关键路径分析法预测车内任务时间范围。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(1):16-33. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.733031. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Multi-Modal Warning Interface on Takeover Efficiency of Autonomous High-Speed Train.多模态预警界面对自主高速列车接管效率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 25;20(1):322. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010322.