Quiroz Diana, Sosef Marc, van Andel Tinde
Wageningen University (Biosystematics Group), P.O. Box 647, 6700 AP Wageningen, The Netherlands; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
National Botanic Garden of Belgium, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2016 Jul 21;188:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 5.
Although ritual plant use is now recognised both for its socio-cultural importance and for its contribution to nature conservation, its potential pharmacological effects remain overlooked.
Our objective was to see whether ritual plant use could have ethnopharmacological relevance through practices that involve direct physical contact with the human body. We hypothesise that ritual practices reflect traditional knowledge on biological activities of plant species, even if plants are used in a symbolic way.
Data were collected in collaboration with traditional healers and ritual plant vendors and harvesters in Benin (West Africa) and Gabon (Central Africa). Both ritual and medicinal uses of plants were recorded. Voucher specimens were collected and identified. We documented different administration routes of ritual plants and selected those whose uses involved direct contact with the human body. Based on our quantitative market surveys and field inventories, we identified 24 commercially or otherwise culturally important species and compared their ritual uses with proven biological activity from the literature.
We recorded 573 plant species with 667 ritual uses, of which ca. 75% (442 species and 499 uses) implied direct contact with the human body. The most common route of administration for ritual treatments was baths, followed by oral ingestion and skin rubbing. One third (186 species) of all ritual plants doubled as medicine for physical ailments. In contrast to previous research that explained the effectiveness of ritual plant use to be a matter of belief, our results hint at the potential medicinal properties of these plants. Ritual treatment of madness caused by evil spirits by the consumption of Rauvolfia vomitoria roots, for example, may be based on the species' proven anticonvulsant properties.
We discuss some of the possible implications of ritual plant use for public health and conclude by suggesting that ritual plant uses that do not involve contact with the human body may also be vehicles for the transmission of traditional medicinal knowledge.
尽管如今仪式性植物的使用因其社会文化重要性及其对自然保护的贡献而得到认可,但其潜在的药理作用仍被忽视。
我们的目标是探究仪式性植物的使用是否通过涉及与人体直接身体接触的实践而具有民族药理学关联。我们假设,即使植物是以象征方式使用,仪式性实践也反映了关于植物物种生物活性的传统知识。
与贝宁(西非)和加蓬(中非)的传统治疗师、仪式性植物供应商及采集者合作收集数据。记录了植物的仪式性和药用用途。采集并鉴定了凭证标本。我们记录了仪式性植物的不同给药途径,并挑选出那些使用涉及与人体直接接触的植物。基于我们的定量市场调查和实地清查,我们确定了24种具有商业价值或以其他方式具有文化重要性的物种,并将它们的仪式性用途与文献中已证实的生物活性进行了比较。
我们记录了573种植物的667种仪式性用途,其中约75%(442种植物和499种用途)涉及与人体直接接触。仪式性治疗最常见的给药途径是沐浴,其次是口服和擦身。所有仪式性植物中有三分之一(186种)兼作身体疾病的药物。与之前将仪式性植物使用的有效性解释为信仰问题的研究不同,我们的结果暗示了这些植物的潜在药用特性。例如,食用萝芙木的根来仪式性治疗由邪灵引起的疯狂,可能基于该物种已证实的抗惊厥特性。
我们讨论了仪式性植物使用对公共卫生的一些可能影响,并通过指出不涉及与人体接触的仪式性植物使用也可能是传统医学知识传播的载体来得出结论。