Thürig Grégoire, Schmitt Jürgen Wilfried, Slankamenac Ksenija, Werner Clément M L
Departement of Traumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Departement of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 May 6;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0100-2. eCollection 2016.
The femoral neck fracture is one of the most common fractures in the elderly. A variety of methods and approaches are used to treat it. Total hip arthroplasty is a preferred approach in independent, mobile, elderly patients, given its more favorable long-term outcome. Our hypothesis is that the direct anterior approach in geriatric trauma patients has a lower dislocation-rate with the advantage of early recovery due to a muscle sparing approach and therefore early possible full weight-bearing.
Patients were retrospectively sought who suffered a femoral neck fracture from 2008 to 2013. All patients were treated through a direct anterior approach and using the same brand of implants. Medical history, standardized physical exam, conventional pelvic plain and axial hip x-rays, Harris Hip Score, Merle D'Aubigné and Postel and SF-36 were assessed.
Eighty-six patients were included in the study with a mean age of seventy-five years. The mortality rate was 16.7 %. Complications were encountered in nineteen patients (22.0 %) who needed operative revision and one postoperative complication (1.2 %) which could be handled conservatively. There were five intraoperative complications (5.8 %), two dislocations (2.3 %), one aseptic loosening in a non-cemented stem (1.2 %), six periprosthetic fractures in non-cemented stems (6.9 %), one displacement of a non-cemented cup (1.2 %), two early infections (2.3 %) and three hematomas (3.5 %) recorded.
Although the direct anterior approach is associated with a rather long learning curve we have found it to preserve the soft-tissues with no injury to abductors. It therefore shows an early advantage in elderly patients in terms of early recovery and therefore early possible full weight-bearing. Fracture treatment with dual mobility cups might lead to lower dislocation rates, but are associated with higher costs. Due to higher complication rates in non-cemented versus cemented shafts, we have changed our practice towards favoring cemented femoral stems in patients with suspected or manifest osteoporosis.
股骨颈骨折是老年人最常见的骨折之一。治疗该骨折有多种方法和入路。全髋关节置换术对于独立、可活动的老年患者而言是一种首选方法,因为其长期疗效更佳。我们的假设是,老年创伤患者采用直接前路入路脱位率较低,且由于该入路保留肌肉,具有早期恢复的优势,因此早期即可完全负重。
回顾性选取2008年至2013年期间发生股骨颈骨折的患者。所有患者均采用直接前路入路并使用同一品牌的植入物。评估患者的病史、标准化体格检查、常规骨盆平片和髋部轴位X线片、Harris髋关节评分、Merle D'Aubigné和Postel评分以及SF-36评分。
86例患者纳入本研究,平均年龄75岁。死亡率为16.7%。19例患者(22.0%)出现并发症,需要手术翻修,1例术后并发症(1.2%)可保守处理。记录到5例术中并发症(5.8%)、2例脱位(2.3%)、1例非骨水泥型股骨柄无菌性松动(1.2%)、6例非骨水泥型股骨柄假体周围骨折(6.9%)、1例非骨水泥型髋臼杯移位(1.2%)、2例早期感染(2.3%)和3例血肿(3.5%)。
尽管直接前路入路的学习曲线较长,但我们发现它能保留软组织,不损伤外展肌。因此,在老年患者中,它在早期恢复及早期完全负重方面具有优势。使用双动髋臼杯进行骨折治疗可能会降低脱位率,但成本较高。由于非骨水泥型股骨柄的并发症发生率高于骨水泥型股骨柄,对于疑似或已确诊骨质疏松的患者,我们已改变治疗方式,倾向于使用骨水泥型股骨柄。