Seifritz Erich, Hatzinger Martin, Holsboer-Trachsler Edith
a Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics , Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland ;
b Psychiatric Services Solothurner Spitäler & University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland ;
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;20(3):126-32. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2016.1179765. Epub 2016 May 10.
efficacy and tolerability of WS(®) 5570 for the treatment of acute mild-to-moderate depression, has been demonstrated in various studies. Here, we present a subgroup analysis of a double blind, randomised trial to compare the therapeutic efficacy of WS(®) 5570 with paroxetine in patients suffering from a major depressive episode with moderate symptom intensity.
moderate depression was defined by a baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) total score between 22 and 25. Patients received, after a single blind placebo run-in phase of 3-7 d, either 3 × 300 mg/d WS(®) 5570 or 20 mg/d paroxetine for six weeks. The change of the HAM-D total score was used to describe the efficacy of WS(®) 5570 compared with paroxetine in the subgroup of patients with moderate depression.
the reductions of the HAM-D total score were significantly more pronounced in patients treated with 3 × 300 mg/d WS(®) 5570 compared to 20 mg/d paroxetine.
patients treated with WS(®) 5570 not only showed a reduction in depression severity score but also yielded greater response and remission rates compared with patients treated with paroxetine. Keypoints Various studies showed the efficacy and tolerability of WS(®) 5570 for the treatment of acute mild-to-moderate depression. Beneficial effects of WS(®) 5570 have been also shown in patients with moderate-to-severe depression. In this study reductions of the HAM-D total score were significantly more pronounced in patients with moderate depression treated with WS(®) 5570 compared with paroxetine. Patients treated with WS(®) 5570 not only showed a reduction in depression severity score but also yielded greater response and remission rates compared with patients treated with paroxetine.
在多项研究中已证实WS(®) 5570治疗急性轻至中度抑郁症的疗效和耐受性。在此,我们对一项双盲随机试验进行亚组分析,以比较WS(®) 5570与帕罗西汀在症状强度为中度的重度抑郁发作患者中的治疗效果。
中度抑郁症定义为汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)基线总分在22至25分之间。在经过3 - 7天的单盲安慰剂导入期后,患者接受为期六周的每日3次、每次300毫克的WS(®) 5570治疗或每日20毫克的帕罗西汀治疗。HAM-D总分的变化用于描述WS(®) 5570与帕罗西汀相比在中度抑郁症患者亚组中的疗效。
与每日20毫克帕罗西汀治疗的患者相比,每日3次、每次300毫克WS(®) 5570治疗的患者HAM-D总分的降低更为显著。
与接受帕罗西汀治疗的患者相比,接受WS(®) 5570治疗的患者不仅抑郁严重程度评分降低,而且反应率和缓解率更高。要点 多项研究表明WS(®) 5570治疗急性轻至中度抑郁症的疗效和耐受性。WS(®) 5570对中重度抑郁症患者也有有益作用。在本研究中,与帕罗西汀相比,接受WS(®) 5570治疗的中度抑郁症患者HAM-D总分的降低更为显著。与接受帕罗西汀治疗的患者相比,接受WS(®) 5570治疗的患者不仅抑郁严重程度评分降低,而且反应率和缓解率更高。