Suppr超能文献

颌面骨固定器械并发症及挽救治疗指征综述

Review of Maxillofacial Hardware Complications and Indications for Salvage.

作者信息

Hernandez Rosa Jonatan, Villanueva Nathaniel L, Sanati-Mehrizy Paymon, Factor Stephanie H, Taub Peter J

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Jun;9(2):134-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570074. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

Abstract

From 2002 to 2006, more than 117,000 facial fractures were recorded in the U.S. National Trauma Database. These fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation. While in place, the hardware facilitates successful bony union. However, when postoperative complications occur, the plates may require removal before bony union. Indications for salvage versus removal of the maxillofacial hardware are not well defined. A literature review was performed to identify instances when hardware may be salvaged. Articles considered for inclusion were found in the PubMed and Web of Science databases in August 2014 with the keywords maxillofacial trauma AND hardware complications OR indications for hardware removal. Included studies looked at human patients with only facial trauma and miniplate fixation, and presented data on complications and/or hardware removal. Fifteen articles were included. None were clinical trials. Complication data were presented by patient, fractures, and/or plate without consistency. The data described 1,075 fractures, 2,961 patients, and 2,592 plates, nonexclusive. Complication rates varied from 6 to 8% by fracture and 6 to 13% by patient. When their data were combined, 50% of complications were treated with plate removal; this was consistent across the mandible, midface, and upper face. All complications caused by loosening, nonunion, broken hardware, and severe/prolonged pain were treated with removal. Some complications caused by exposures, deformities, and infections were treated with salvage. Exposed plates were treated with flaps, plates with deformities were treated with secondary procedures including hardware revision, and hardware infections were treated with antibiotics alone or in conjunction with soft-tissue debridement and/or tooth extraction. Well-designed clinical trials evaluating hardware removal versus salvage are lacking. Some postoperative complications caused by exposure, deformity, and/or infection may be successfully treated with plate salvage. We propose an algorithm using this review and clinical expertise. We also propose that a national databank be created where surgeons can uniformly compile their patient information and examine it in a standardized format to further our understanding of clinical management.

摘要

2002年至2006年期间,美国国家创伤数据库记录了超过11.7万例面部骨折。这些骨折通常采用切开复位内固定治疗。植入内固定物后,有助于实现成功的骨愈合。然而,术后出现并发症时,可能需要在骨愈合前取出钢板。关于挽救与取出颌面内固定物的指征尚无明确界定。我们进行了一项文献综述,以确定何时可以挽救内固定物。2014年8月,在PubMed和科学网数据库中检索到了考虑纳入的文章,关键词为颌面创伤、硬件并发症或硬件取出指征。纳入的研究观察了仅患有面部创伤且采用微型钢板固定的人类患者,并提供了有关并发症和/或硬件取出的数据。共纳入15篇文章。均非临床试验。并发症数据按患者、骨折和/或钢板呈现,缺乏一致性。数据描述了1075例骨折、2961例患者和2592块钢板,并非相互排斥。骨折的并发症发生率为6%至8%,患者的并发症发生率为6%至13%。综合这些数据,50%的并发症通过取出钢板进行治疗;在下颌骨、中面部和上面部均是如此。所有由内固定物松动、骨不连、断裂以及严重/长期疼痛引起的并发症均通过取出进行治疗。一些由内固定物外露、畸形和感染引起的并发症通过挽救治疗。外露的钢板采用皮瓣覆盖治疗,畸形的钢板采用包括硬件翻修在内的二次手术治疗,硬件感染单独使用抗生素或联合软组织清创和/或拔牙治疗。缺乏评估硬件取出与挽救的精心设计的临床试验。一些由外露、畸形和/或感染引起的术后并发症可能通过钢板挽救成功治疗。我们基于此次综述和临床专业知识提出了一种算法。我们还提议创建一个国家数据库,外科医生可以在其中统一汇编患者信息,并以标准化格式进行审查,以加深我们对临床管理的理解。

相似文献

1
Review of Maxillofacial Hardware Complications and Indications for Salvage.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Jun;9(2):134-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570074. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
3
Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures: patient-reported outcomes and hardware-related complications.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Complications after surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):853-859. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Oct;40(5):587-91. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0348-5. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
9
Symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: a review of 76 cases.
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Dec;55(6):603-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000183802.38116.37.
10
Soft tissue reconstruction and salvage of infected fixation hardware in lower extremity trauma.
Microsurgery. 2018 Mar;38(3):259-263. doi: 10.1002/micr.30176. Epub 2017 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A biosynthetic thumb prosthesis.
NPJ Biomed Innov. 2025;2(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s44385-025-00031-z. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Robot-assisted versus traditional fixation for the treatment of calcaneal fractures: a meta-analysis.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 27;25(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07726-1.
3
The role of CT-DCG in hardware - associated secondary acquired lacrimal duct obstruction: SALDO update study - (SUP) - Paper III.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024 Feb 21;34:102026. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102026. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
A Comprehensive Review on Managing Fracture Calcaneum by Surgical and Non-surgical Modalities.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54786. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Biomechanical Evaluation of WE43 Magnesium Plates for Mandibular Fracture Fixation.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 10;9:803103. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.803103. eCollection 2021.
8
In vivo biocompatibility evaluation of 3D-printed nickel-titanium fabricated by selective laser melting.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022 Jan 21;33(2):13. doi: 10.1007/s10856-022-06641-y.
9
Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Jun 23;2021:9947350. doi: 10.1155/2021/9947350. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Rigid internal fixation of infected mandibular fractures.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 May;67(5):1046-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.036.
2
Soft-tissue defects and exposed hardware: a review of indications for soft-tissue reconstruction and hardware preservation.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Apr;123(4):1256-1263. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819f2b5e.
3
The fate of titanium miniplates and screws used in maxillofacial surgery: a 10 year retrospective study.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;38(7):731-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.016. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
4
Removal of bone plates in patients with maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 May;105(5):e32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
6
Reasons for miniplate removal following maxillofacial trauma: a 4-year study.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Oct;34(7):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
7
Factors associated with long-term complications after repair of mandibular fractures.
Laryngoscope. 2006 Mar;116(3):427-30. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000194844.87268.ED.
8
Plate removal in traumatic facial fractures: 13-year practice review.
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Dec;55(6):608-11. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000189666.13860.c0.
9
Symptomatic plate removal in maxillofacial trauma: a review of 76 cases.
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Dec;55(6):603-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000183802.38116.37.
10
Two hundred ninety-four consecutive facial fractures in an urban trauma center: lessons learned.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Sep;116(3):42e-49e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000177687.83247.27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验