Suppr超能文献

危重症患者急性呼吸衰竭的无创与有创正压通气:一项比较队列研究

Noninvasive and invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients: a comparative cohort study.

作者信息

Meeder Annelijn M, Tjan Dave H T, van Zanten Arthur R H

机构信息

1 University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands ; 2 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716, Ede, The Netherlands ; 3 Medical Manager Care Division, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2016 May;8(5):813-25. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) for acute respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with a marked reduction in intubation rate, complications, hospital length of stay and mortality. Multiple studies have indicated that patients failing NPPV have worse outcomes compared with patients with successful NPPV treatment; however limited data is available on risks associated with NPPV failure resulting in (delayed) intubation and outcomes compared with initial intubation. The purpose of this study is to assess rates and predictors of NPPV failure and to compare hospital outcomes of patients with NPPV failure with those patients primarily intubated without a prior NPPV trial.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study using data from patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to the ICU in the period 2013-2014. All patients treated with NPPV were evaluated. A sample of patients who were primarily intubated was randomly selected to serve as controls for the group of patients who failed NPPV.

RESULTS

NPPV failure was recorded in 30.8% of noninvasively ventilated patients and was associated with longer ICU stay [OR, 1.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.04-1.30] and lower survival rates (OR, 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.59) compared with NPPV success. Multivariate analysis showed presence of severe sepsis at study entry, higher Simplified Acute Physiology II Score (SAPS-II) score, lower ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen (PF-ratio) and lower plasma glucose were predictors for NPPV failure. After controlling for potential confounders, patients with NPPV failure did not show any difference in hospital outcomes compared with patients who were primarily intubated.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute respiratory failure and NPPV failure have worse outcomes compared with NPPV success patients, however not worse than initially intubated patients. An initial trial of NPPV therefore may be suitable in selected cases of patients with acute respiratory failure, since NPPV could be potentially beneficial and does not seem to result in worse outcome in case of NPPV failure compared to primary intubation. A prospective trial is warranted to confirm findings.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)中,无创正压通气(NPPV)用于治疗急性呼吸衰竭,可显著降低插管率、并发症、住院时间及死亡率。多项研究表明,与NPPV治疗成功的患者相比,NPPV治疗失败的患者预后更差;然而,与初始插管相比,关于NPPV失败导致(延迟)插管及预后相关风险的数据有限。本研究旨在评估NPPV失败的发生率及预测因素,并比较NPPV失败患者与未进行NPPV试验而直接插管患者的住院结局。

方法

一项回顾性观察性研究,使用2013 - 2014年期间入住ICU的急性呼吸衰竭患者的数据。对所有接受NPPV治疗的患者进行评估。随机选取一组直接插管的患者作为NPPV失败患者组的对照。

结果

30.8%的无创通气患者记录有NPPV失败,与NPPV成功相比,NPPV失败与更长的ICU住院时间相关[比值比(OR),1.16,95%置信区间(95%CI):1.04 - 1.30]及更低的生存率(OR,0.10,95%CI:0.02 - 0.59)。多变量分析显示,研究开始时存在严重脓毒症、更高的简化急性生理学II评分(SAPS-II)、更低的动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数比值(PF比值)及更低的血糖是NPPV失败的预测因素。在控制潜在混杂因素后,NPPV失败患者与直接插管患者相比,住院结局无差异。

结论

与NPPV成功的患者相比,急性呼吸衰竭且NPPV失败的患者预后更差,但不比初始插管患者更差。因此,对于部分急性呼吸衰竭患者,初始NPPV试验可能是合适的,因为NPPV可能有益,且与直接插管相比,NPPV失败时似乎不会导致更差的结局。有必要进行前瞻性试验以证实研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验