Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts2Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1997-2008. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5453.
Although attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is highly prevalent in adolescents and often persists into adulthood, most studies about treatment were performed in children. Less is known about ADHD treatment in adolescents.
To review the evidence for pharmacological and psychosocial treatment of ADHD in adolescents.
The databases of CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for articles published between January 1, 1999, and January 31, 2016, on ADHD treatment in adolescents. Additional studies were identified by hand-searching reference lists of retrieved articles. Study quality was rated using McMaster University Effective Public Health Practice Project criteria. The evidence level for treatment recommendations was based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.
Sixteen randomized clinical trials and 1 meta-analysis, involving 2668 participants, of pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for ADHD in adolescents aged 12 years to 18 years were included. Evidence of efficacy was stronger for the extended-release methylphenidate and amphetamine class stimulant medications (level 1B based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria) and atomoxetine than for the extended-release α2-adrenergic agonists guanfacine or clonidine (no studies). For the primary efficacy measure of total symptom score on the ADHD Rating Scale (score range, 0 [least symptomatic] to 54 [most symptomatic]), both stimulant and nonstimulant medications led to clinically significant reductions of 14.93 to 24.60 absolute points. The psychosocial treatments combining behavioral, cognitive behavioral, and skills training techniques demonstrated small- to medium-sized improvements (range for mean SD difference in Cohen d, 0.30-0.69) for parent-rated ADHD symptoms, co-occurring emotional or behavioral symptoms, and interpersonal functioning. Psychosocial treatments were associated with more robust (Cohen d range, 0.51-5.15) improvements in academic and organizational skills, such as homework completion and planner use.
Evidence supports the use of extended-release methylphenidate and amphetamine formulations, atomoxetine, and extended-release guanfacine to improve symptoms of ADHD in adolescents. Psychosocial treatments incorporating behavior contingency management, motivational enhancement, and academic, organizational, and social skills training techniques were associated with inconsistent effects on ADHD symptoms and greater benefit for academic and organizational skills. Additional treatment studies in adolescents, including combined pharmacological and psychosocial treatments, are needed.
尽管注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)在青少年中非常普遍,且通常会持续到成年,但大多数关于治疗的研究都是在儿童中进行的。关于青少年 ADHD 的治疗方法,我们知之甚少。
综述 ADHD 青少年药物治疗和心理社会治疗的证据。
检索了 CINAHL Plus、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、ERIC 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库,以获取 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 1 月 31 日期间发表的关于青少年 ADHD 治疗的文章。通过检索文章的参考文献列表,还发现了其他一些研究。使用麦克马斯特大学有效公共卫生实践项目标准来评价研究质量。根据牛津循证医学中心标准,对治疗建议的证据水平进行了评估。
纳入了 16 项随机临床试验和 1 项荟萃分析,共涉及 2668 名 12 岁至 18 岁青少年的 ADHD 药物治疗和心理社会治疗,涉及药物包括哌甲酯和安非他命类兴奋剂、阿托西汀等。对于延长释放型 α2-肾上腺素能激动剂胍法辛和可乐定(无研究),疗效证据强于延长释放型苯丙胺类兴奋剂(基于牛津循证医学中心标准,证据等级为 1B 级)和托莫西汀。对于 ADHD 评定量表(得分范围 0[症状最轻]至 54[症状最重])的主要疗效测量指标,总症状评分,所有兴奋剂和非兴奋剂药物均导致绝对评分 14.93 至 24.60 的显著降低。结合行为、认知行为和技能训练技术的心理社会治疗,在父母评定的 ADHD 症状、共病的情绪或行为症状和人际关系功能方面,显示出较小至中等程度的改善(Cohen d 平均值差异范围,0.30-0.69)。心理社会治疗与作业完成和使用计划器等学业和组织技能的更显著改善(Cohen d 范围,0.51-5.15)相关。
有证据支持使用哌甲酯和安非他命类兴奋剂、托莫西汀和胍法辛,改善青少年 ADHD 症状。纳入行为反应管理、动机增强以及学业、组织和社会技能训练技术的心理社会治疗与 ADHD 症状的不一致影响有关,对学业和组织技能的益处更大。需要对青少年进行更多的联合药物和心理社会治疗的治疗研究。