Jensen Jonas, Olesen Jacob Bjerring, Stuart Matthias Bo, Hansen Peter Møller, Nielsen Michael Bachmann, Jensen Jørgen Arendt
Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Dept. of Elec. Eng., Bldg. 349, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Dept. of Elec. Eng., Bldg. 349, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
Ultrasonics. 2016 Aug;70:136-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
A method for vector velocity volume flow estimation is presented, along with an investigation of its sources of error and correction of actual volume flow measurements. Volume flow errors are quantified theoretically by numerical modeling, through flow phantom measurements, and studied in vivo. This paper investigates errors from estimating volumetric flow using a commercial ultrasound scanner and the common assumptions made in the literature. The theoretical model shows, e.g. that volume flow is underestimated by 15%, when the scan plane is off-axis with the vessel center by 28% of the vessel radius. The error sources were also studied in vivo under realistic clinical conditions, and the theoretical results were applied for correcting the volume flow errors. Twenty dialysis patients with arteriovenous fistulas were scanned to obtain vector flow maps of fistulas. When fitting an ellipsis to cross-sectional scans of the fistulas, the major axis was on average 10.2mm, which is 8.6% larger than the minor axis. The ultrasound beam was on average 1.5mm from the vessel center, corresponding to 28% of the semi-major axis in an average fistula. Estimating volume flow with an elliptical, rather than circular, vessel area and correcting the ultrasound beam for being off-axis, gave a significant (p=0.008) reduction in error from 31.2% to 24.3%. The error is relative to the Ultrasound Dilution Technique, which is considered the gold standard for volume flow estimation for dialysis patients. The study shows the importance of correcting for volume flow errors, which are often made in clinical practice.
本文提出了一种用于估计矢量速度体积流量的方法,同时对其误差来源进行了研究,并对实际体积流量测量进行了校正。通过数值建模、流动模型测量从理论上对体积流量误差进行了量化,并在体内进行了研究。本文研究了使用商用超声扫描仪估计体积流量时产生的误差以及文献中常用的假设。理论模型表明,例如,当扫描平面与血管中心的偏离角度为血管半径的28%时,体积流量会被低估15%。还在实际临床条件下对体内的误差来源进行了研究,并将理论结果应用于校正体积流量误差。对20名患有动静脉瘘的透析患者进行扫描,以获取瘘管的矢量流图。当对瘘管的横截面扫描拟合椭圆时,长轴平均为10.2mm,比短轴大8.6%。超声束平均距离血管中心1.5mm,相当于平均瘘管半长轴的28%。用椭圆形而非圆形的血管面积估计体积流量,并校正超声束的偏轴情况,可使误差从31.2%显著(p = 0.008)降低至24.3%。该误差是相对于超声稀释技术而言的,超声稀释技术被认为是透析患者体积流量估计的金标准。该研究表明校正体积流量误差的重要性,而这在临床实践中经常被忽视。