Tehan Peta Ellen, Santos Derek, Chuter Vivienne Helaine
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medicine, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Vasc Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):382-9. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16645854. Epub 2016 May 10.
The toe-brachial index (TBI) is used as an adjunct to the ankle-brachial index (ABI) for non-invasive lower limb vascular screening. With increasing evidence suggesting limitations of the ABI for diagnosis of vascular complications, particularly in specific populations including diabetes cohorts, the TBI is being used more widely. The aim of this review was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the TBI for detecting peripheral artery disease (PAD) in populations at risk of this disease. A database search was conducted to identify current work relating to the sensitivity and specificity of toe-brachial indices up to July 2015. Only studies using valid diagnostic imaging as a reference standard were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to critically appraise included articles. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Sensitivity of the TBI for PAD was reported in all seven studies and ranged from 45% to 100%; specificity was reported by five studies only and ranged from 16% to 100%. In conclusion, this review suggests that the TBI has variable diagnostic accuracy for the presence of PAD in specific populations at risk of developing the disease. There was a notable lack of large-scale diagnostic accuracy studies determining the diagnostic accuracy of the TBI in detecting PAD in different at-risk cohorts. However, standardised normal values need to be established for the TBI to conclusively determine the diagnostic accuracy of this test.
趾臂指数(TBI)被用作踝臂指数(ABI)的辅助指标,用于非侵入性下肢血管筛查。随着越来越多的证据表明ABI在诊断血管并发症方面存在局限性,尤其是在包括糖尿病患者群体在内的特定人群中,TBI的应用越来越广泛。本综述的目的是确定TBI在检测有外周动脉疾病(PAD)风险人群中PAD的敏感性和特异性。进行了数据库检索,以识别截至2015年7月与趾臂指数敏感性和特异性相关的当前研究。仅纳入使用有效诊断成像作为参考标准的研究。使用QUADAS - 2工具对纳入的文章进行严格评价。七项研究符合纳入标准。所有七项研究均报告了TBI对PAD的敏感性,范围为45%至100%;仅五项研究报告了特异性,范围为16%至100%。总之,本综述表明,TBI在有患PAD风险的特定人群中对PAD存在的诊断准确性存在差异。明显缺乏大规模诊断准确性研究来确定TBI在不同风险队列中检测PAD的诊断准确性。然而,需要为TBI建立标准化的正常值,以便最终确定该测试的诊断准确性。