Ford Loretta T, Berg Jonathan D
Department Clinical Biochemistry, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2017 Mar;54(2):219-229. doi: 10.1177/0004563216651646. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
Introduction Legal highs also known as novel psychoactive substances mimic the effects of classic drugs of abuse. Challenges to developing screening services for novel psychoactive substances include identifying which novel psychoactive substances are available to target. Using new techniques such as exact mass time of flight can help identify common novel psychoactive substances to target for screening patient samples by routine methods such as tandem mass spectrometry. We demonstrate this strategy working in our own clinical toxicology laboratory after qualitative analysis of 98 suspect materials for novel psychoactive substances by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with time of flight mass spectrometry. Results From July 2014 to July 2015 we received 98 requests to test a range of different suspect materials for novel psychoactive substances including herbs, tobacco, liquids, pills and powders. Overall, 87% of the suspect materials tested positive for novel psychoactive substances, and 15% for controlled drugs. Three common novel psychoactive substances were present in 74% of the suspect materials: methiopropamine, a methamphetamine analogue; ethylphenidate, a cocaine mimic; and the third generation synthetic cannabinoid 5F-AKB-48. For the 55 branded products we tested only 24% of the stated contents matched exactly the compounds we detected. Conclusion Testing suspect materials using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with time of flight mass spectrometry has identified three common novel psychoactive substances in use in the UK, simplifying the development of a relevant novel psychoactive substances screening service to our population. By incorporating this into our routine liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry drugs of abuse screen, then offers a clinically relevant novel psychoactive substances service to our users. This strategy ensures our clinical toxicology service continues to remain effective to meet the challenges of the changing drug use in the UK.
引言 合法兴奋剂也被称为新型精神活性物质,可模拟经典滥用药物的效果。为新型精神活性物质开发筛查服务面临的挑战包括确定哪些新型精神活性物质可供作为目标。使用诸如精确质量飞行时间等新技术有助于识别常见的新型精神活性物质,以便通过串联质谱等常规方法对患者样本进行筛查。在通过超高效液相色谱与飞行时间质谱对98种可疑新型精神活性物质材料进行定性分析后,我们在自己的临床毒理学实验室证明了这一策略的有效性。
结果 2014年7月至2015年7月,我们收到了98份对一系列不同可疑新型精神活性物质材料进行检测的请求,这些材料包括草药、烟草、液体、药丸和粉末。总体而言,87%的可疑材料新型精神活性物质检测呈阳性,15%的材料受控药物检测呈阳性。74%的可疑材料中存在三种常见的新型精神活性物质:甲基苯丙胺类似物甲硫丙胺;可卡因模拟物乙哌立松;以及第三代合成大麻素5F-AKB-48。对于我们检测的55种品牌产品,仅24%的标明成分与我们检测到的化合物完全匹配。
结论 使用超高效液相色谱与飞行时间质谱对可疑材料进行检测,已识别出英国正在使用的三种常见新型精神活性物质,简化了针对我国人群的相关新型精神活性物质筛查服务的开发。通过将此纳入我们常规的液相色谱串联质谱滥用药物筛查,可为我们的用户提供具有临床相关性的新型精神活性物质服务。这一策略确保我们的临床毒理学服务继续保持有效,以应对英国不断变化的药物使用挑战。