• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康志愿者参与研究项目。

Participation of healthy volunteers in research projects.

作者信息

Macrae F A, Mackay I R, Fraser J R

机构信息

Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1989 Mar 20;150(6):325-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136494.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136494.x
PMID:2716643
Abstract

Research that involves healthy normal volunteers frequently is performed. This article examines ethical guide-lines for the recruitment of healthy volunteers in research projects. Ethical decisions on projects that are based on patient-volunteers or healthy normal volunteers should balance the risk to the volunteer and the collective benefit to the community. For healthy normal volunteers that risk should be minimal or trivial. Investigators should follow recruitment practices that avoid approaches to persons who are dependent upon them in some way, and should carry the day-to-day ethical responsibility even after institutional ethical approval has been granted. Pilot studies and self-experimentation readily can transgress ethical guide-lines. Compensation for mishaps or injuries that occur during research in which there is no question of negligence (for example, an unforeseeable reaction in a phase-1 drug trial) is an unresolved issue which should be addressed by the research community. It is recommended that action be taken to ensure that healthy volunteers who participate in approved research have redress in the rare event of an accident, whether this is a result of negligence, chance or misadventure. Hospitals/institutions or other bodies that sponsor research should extend their insurance to cover specifically such unforeseeable events in which there may be liability, and to have the facility for a payment of beneficence in the case of accidents in which liability cannot be established.

摘要

涉及健康正常志愿者的研究经常进行。本文探讨了研究项目中招募健康志愿者的伦理准则。基于患者志愿者或健康正常志愿者的项目所做的伦理决策,应在志愿者所承担的风险与给社会带来的集体利益之间取得平衡。对于健康正常志愿者而言,这种风险应降至最低或微不足道。研究人员应遵循招募规范,避免接触在某些方面依赖他们的人群,并且即使在获得机构伦理批准之后,仍应承担日常的伦理责任。初步研究和自我实验很容易违反伦理准则。对于在不存在疏忽问题的研究过程中发生的不幸事件或伤害(例如,一期药物试验中不可预见的反应)的赔偿,是一个尚未解决的问题,研究界应予以关注。建议采取行动,确保参与已获批准研究的健康志愿者在罕见的事故发生时能够得到补偿,无论事故是由疏忽、偶然因素还是意外造成的。赞助研究的医院/机构或其他团体应扩大其保险范围,专门涵盖可能存在责任的此类不可预见事件,并在无法确定责任的事故中具备支付慈善款项的机制。

相似文献

1
Participation of healthy volunteers in research projects.健康志愿者参与研究项目。
Med J Aust. 1989 Mar 20;150(6):325-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136494.x.
2
Ethics of evaluation of new drugs in human volunteers.人体志愿者新药评估的伦理问题。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1991 Jan;20(1):101-5.
3
Guidelines for medical research -- some ethical and legal problems.医学研究指南——一些伦理和法律问题。
Med Law Rev. 1993 Summer;1(2):160-85. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/1.2.160.
4
Experience at a clinical research ethical review committee.在临床研究伦理审查委员会的经历。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Nov 14;283(6302):1312-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.283.6302.1312.
5
Research on healthy volunteers: a report of the Royal College of Physicians.
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1986 Oct;20(4):3-17.
6
Ethical issues in clinical research: the role of the research ethics committee.临床研究中的伦理问题:研究伦理委员会的作用
Br J Urol. 1995 Nov;76 Suppl 2:23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07867.x.
7
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations.美国儿科学会。药物委员会。评估儿科人群药物的研究伦理行为指南。
Pediatrics. 1977 Jul;60(1):91-101.
8
Weiss v. Solomon: a case study in institutional responsibility for clinical research.魏斯诉所罗门案:临床研究机构责任的案例分析
Law Med Health Care. 1990 Winter;18(4):395-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb01155.x.
9
Compensating subjects of medical research.医学研究的补偿对象。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):131-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.131.
10
The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.伦理审查委员会的结构与运作。
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(20):1791-800. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90273-8.