Shoag Jonathan, Mittal Sameer, Halpern Joshua A, Scherr Douglas, Hu Jim C, Barbieri Christopher E
Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 May 7.
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial randomized men to usual care or annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for 6 yr and digital rectal examination for 4 yr. This trial found no difference between the intervention and usual care arms of the study in the primary end point of prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality. The PLCO trial results have had a major impact on health policy and the rate of PSA screening in the United States. We analyzed the 13-yr screening and outcomes data from the 151 participants who died of PCa in the screening arm of the trial to better understand how randomization to screening failed to prevent PCa death in these men. We found that of these men, 81 (53.6%) either were never screened as part of the trial or had an initial positive screen. Only 17 (11.3%) of those who died reached year 6 of the trial with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml. The men who died in the screening arm were also older at study entry than the average PLCO participant (66 vs 62 yr; p < 0.001). Our analysis should inform the interpretation of the PLCO trial and provide insight into future trial design.
前列腺、肺、结肠直肠和卵巢(PLCO)癌筛查试验将男性随机分为接受常规护理组或每年进行前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查6年及直肠指检4年组。该试验发现,在前列腺癌(PCa)特异性死亡率这一主要终点上,研究的干预组和常规护理组之间没有差异。PLCO试验结果对美国的卫生政策和PSA筛查率产生了重大影响。我们分析了试验筛查组中151名死于PCa的参与者的13年筛查及结果数据,以更好地理解随机分配到筛查组为何未能预防这些男性的PCa死亡。我们发现,在这些男性中,81人(53.6%)要么从未作为试验的一部分接受过筛查,要么初次筛查呈阳性。在那些死亡的人中,只有17人(11.3%)在试验进行到第6年时PSA<4.0 ng/ml。筛查组中死亡的男性在研究入组时也比PLCO参与者的平均年龄更大(66岁对62岁;p<0.001)。我们的分析应为PLCO试验的解读提供参考,并为未来的试验设计提供见解。