Gao Lei, Deng Yi Qin, Chen Chang, Ke Chang Wen, Li Bo Sheng, Long Yun Ying, Liu Zhu Hong, Wei Lu
1 CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology , South China Sea Institution of Oceanology, CAS, Guangzhou, China .
2 Institute of Pathogenic Microorganisms, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Guangzhou, China .
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2016 Jun;13(6):333-42. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2098. Epub 2016 May 11.
To study the relationship between environmental and clinical populations of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, we collected in total 86 isolates from Southern China during one and a half years. Sixty-eight isolates were recovered from aquaculture ponds, a seafood market, and restaurants, and 18 isolates were recovered from clinical samples. Virulence gene analysis revealed that 25 isolates (14 clinical and 11 environmental) tested positive for tdh, but only 4 carried trh. Interestingly, none of the tdh(+) environmental isolates was recovered from ponds. Both environmental and clinical tdh(+) isolates, except for one clinical isolate, harbor type III secretion system 2α (T3SS2α) and T3SS2β-related genes, including vopB2α, which was previously suggested to be absent from environmental strains. More than 70% of clinical isolates carried the pandemic marker of new toxRS (GS-PCR(+)), which was not present in the environmental isolates. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing analysis showed a high degree of genetic diversity within the environmental isolates. In contrast, the clinical population formed a tight cluster that differed from the environmental isolates. These findings suggest that the pandemic strains of V. parahaemolyticus may not directly originate from marine animals. Rather the environments where they are maintained could serve as reservoirs for toxigenic, but not pandemic strains. These environments provide an ideal place for generation of new toxigenic strains through DNA exchange, which was revealed by extensive recombination events in recA sequences of the environmental isolates.
为研究副溶血性弧菌环境菌株与临床菌株之间的关系,我们在一年半的时间里从中国南方总共收集了86株菌株。其中68株从水产养殖池塘、海鲜市场和餐馆中分离得到,18株从临床样本中分离得到。毒力基因分析显示,25株菌株(14株临床菌株和11株环境菌株)tdh检测呈阳性,但只有4株携带trh。有趣的是,tdh阳性的环境菌株均未从池塘中分离得到。除一株临床菌株外,环境和临床tdh阳性菌株均携带III型分泌系统2α(T3SS2α)和T3SS2β相关基因,包括vopB2α,此前认为该基因在环境菌株中不存在。超过70% 的临床菌株携带新型toxRS的大流行标志物(GS-PCR阳性),环境菌株中未发现该标志物。脉冲场凝胶电泳和多位点序列分型分析表明,环境菌株具有高度的遗传多样性。相比之下,临床菌株形成了一个紧密的聚类,与环境菌株不同。这些发现表明,副溶血性弧菌的大流行菌株可能并非直接源自海洋动物。相反,它们生存的环境可能是产毒菌株而非大流行菌株的储存库。这些环境为通过DNA交换产生新的产毒菌株提供了理想场所,这在环境菌株recA序列中的广泛重组事件中得到了体现。