Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法与超声引导下低剂量关节内类固醇注射治疗糖尿病合并肩袖冻结肩患者肩关节疼痛、功能和活动度的疗效比较。

Effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy versus ultrasound-guided low-dose intra-articular steroid injection in improving shoulder pain, function, and range of motion in diabetic patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1300-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.005.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

To compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (rESWT) vs. an ultrasound-guided low-dose intra-articular steroid injection in pain reduction and functional improvement in diabetic patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis (AC).

METHODS

This was a 2-parallel-group, active-control, assessor-blinded, randomized trial. We randomized 103 diabetic patients with shoulder AC to receive either 4 sessions of rESWT, 1 week apart (rESWT group, n = 52), or a single ultrasound-guided low-dose intra-articular steroid injection of 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (steroid group, n = 51). The primary outcome measure was functional improvement evaluated by the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) score. Secondary outcome measures were pain evaluated by the visual analog scale score and shoulder range of motion (ROM). An assessor who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed both groups at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks thereafter.

RESULTS

By 12 weeks, both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the qDASH score and pain severity, as well as improvement in ROM. However, significantly improved function (qDASH score, 40.4 ± 12.9 vs. 50.5 ± 13.3; P < .001) and shoulder pain reduction (visual analog scale score, 1.6 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 1.7; P < .001) were found in the rESWT group vs. the steroid group. Similar improvement in shoulder ROM was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

At short-term follow-up, rESWT was superior to a low-dose intra-articular steroid injection in improving function and pain in diabetic patients with shoulder AC. Therefore, rESWT might be considered a safe alternative to steroid injections in diabetic patients with shoulder AC.

摘要

目的

比较桡骨体外冲击波治疗(rESWT)与超声引导下低剂量关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗糖尿病合并粘连性肩关节囊炎(AC)患者疼痛缓解和功能改善的疗效。

方法

这是一项 2 组平行、主动对照、评估者盲法、随机临床试验。我们将 103 例糖尿病合并肩 AC 患者随机分为 4 组,每周 1 次,共 4 次 rESWT(rESWT 组,n = 52),或单次超声引导下低剂量关节内 20mg 曲安奈德皮质类固醇注射(类固醇组,n = 51)。主要观察指标为采用快速上肢和手部功能障碍问卷(Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand,qDASH)评分评估的功能改善。次要观察指标为视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale,VAS)评分评估的疼痛和肩关节活动度(range of motion,ROM)。评估者对治疗分配设盲,在基线和 4、8、12 周后评估两组患者。

结果

治疗 12 周后,两组患者的 qDASH 评分和疼痛严重程度均显著降低,ROM 显著改善。然而,rESWT 组在功能改善(qDASH 评分,40.4 ± 12.9 比 50.5 ± 13.3;P <.001)和肩部疼痛减轻(VAS 评分,1.6 ± 1.2 比 2.8 ± 1.7;P <.001)方面显著优于类固醇组。两组患者的肩部 ROM 均有相似程度的改善。

结论

短期随访结果表明,rESWT 在改善糖尿病合并肩 AC 患者的功能和疼痛方面优于低剂量关节内皮质类固醇注射。因此,rESWT 可能是糖尿病合并肩 AC 患者皮质类固醇注射的安全替代疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验