Ham Dong Yeub, Choi Woo Suk, Song Sang Hoon, Ahn Young-Joon, Park Hyoung Keun, Kim Hyeong Gon, Son Hwancheol
Department of Urology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
World J Mens Health. 2016 Apr;34(1):47-55. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2016.34.1.47. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a multimedia informed consent (IC) presentation on the understanding and satisfaction of patients who were scheduled to receive 120-W green-light high-performance system photoselective vaporization of the prostate (HPS-PVP).
A multimedia IC (M-IC) presentation for HPS-PVP was developed. Forty men with benign prostatic hyperplasia who were scheduled to undergo HPS-PVP were prospectively randomized to a conventional written IC group (W-IC group, n=20) or the M-IC group (n=20). The allocated IC was obtained by one certified urologist, followed by a 15-question test (maximum score, 15) to evaluate objective understanding, and questionnaires on subjective understanding (range, 010) and satisfaction (range, 010) using a visual analogue scale.
Demographic characteristics, including age and the highest level of education, did not significantly differ between the two groups. No significant differences were found in scores reflecting the objective understanding of HPS-PVP (9.9±2.3 vs. 10.6±2.8, p=0.332) or in subjective understanding scores (7.5±2.1 vs. 8.6±1.7, p=0.122); however, the M-IC group showed higher satisfaction scores than the W-IC group (7.4±1.7 vs. 8.4±1.5, p=0.033). After adjusting for age and educational level, the M-IC group still had significantly higher satisfaction scores.
M-IC did not enhance the objective knowledge of patients regarding this surgical procedure. However, it improved the satisfaction of patients with the IC process itself.
本研究旨在评估多媒体知情同意书(IC)演示对计划接受120瓦绿光高性能系统前列腺光选择性汽化术(HPS-PVP)患者的理解和满意度的影响。
开发了用于HPS-PVP的多媒体IC(M-IC)演示。40名计划接受HPS-PVP的良性前列腺增生男性患者被前瞻性随机分为传统书面IC组(W-IC组,n = 20)或M-IC组(n = 20)。由一名认证泌尿科医生获取分配的IC,随后进行一项包含15个问题的测试(满分15分)以评估客观理解,并使用视觉模拟量表进行关于主观理解(范围0至10)和满意度(范围0至10)的问卷调查。
两组之间的人口统计学特征,包括年龄和最高教育水平,无显著差异。在反映对HPS-PVP客观理解的得分(9.9±2.3对10.6±2.8,p = 0.332)或主观理解得分(7.5±2.1对8.6±1.7,p = 0.122)方面未发现显著差异;然而,M-IC组的满意度得分高于W-IC组(7.4±1.7对8.4±1.5,p = 0.033)。在调整年龄和教育水平后,M-IC组的满意度得分仍显著更高。
M-IC并未增强患者对该手术过程的客观知识。然而,它提高了患者对IC过程本身的满意度。