• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多媒体数字知情同意工具与传统纸质方法的比较:随机对照试验

Comparing a Multimedia Digital Informed Consent Tool With Traditional Paper-Based Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Abujarad Fuad, Peduzzi Peter, Mun Sophia, Carlson Kristina, Edwards Chelsea, Dziura James, Brandt Cynthia, Alfano Sandra, Chupp Geoffrey

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 19;5(10):e20458. doi: 10.2196/20458.

DOI:10.2196/20458
PMID:34665142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8564662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The traditional informed consent (IC) process rarely emphasizes research participants' comprehension of medical information, leaving them vulnerable to unknown risks and consequences associated with procedures or studies.

OBJECTIVE

This paper explores how we evaluated the feasibility of a digital health tool called Virtual Multimedia Interactive Informed Consent (VIC) for advancing the IC process and compared the results with traditional paper-based methods of IC.

METHODS

Using digital health and web-based coaching, we developed the VIC tool that uses multimedia and other digital features to improve the current IC process. The tool was developed on the basis of the user-centered design process and Mayer's cognitive theory of multimedia learning. This study is a randomized controlled trial that compares the feasibility of VIC with standard paper consent to understand the impact of interactive digital consent. Participants were recruited from the Winchester Chest Clinic at Yale New Haven Hospital in New Haven, Connecticut, and healthy individuals were recruited from the community using fliers. In this coordinator-assisted trial, participants were randomized to complete the IC process using VIC on the iPad or with traditional paper consent. The study was conducted at the Winchester Chest Clinic, and the outcomes were self-assessed through coordinator-administered questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 50 participants were recruited in the study (VIC, n=25; paper, n=25). The participants in both groups had high comprehension. VIC participants reported higher satisfaction, higher perceived ease of use, higher ability to complete the consent independently, and shorter perceived time to complete the consent process.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dynamic, interactive audiovisual elements in VIC may improve participants' satisfaction and facilitate the IC process. We believe that using VIC in an ongoing, real-world study rather than a hypothetical study improved the reliability of our findings, which demonstrates VIC's potential to improve research participants' comprehension and the overall process of IC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02537886; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02537886.

摘要

背景

传统的知情同意(IC)流程很少强调研究参与者对医学信息的理解,使他们容易受到与程序或研究相关的未知风险和后果的影响。

目的

本文探讨了我们如何评估一种名为虚拟多媒体交互式知情同意(VIC)的数字健康工具推进IC流程的可行性,并将结果与传统的纸质IC方法进行比较。

方法

利用数字健康和基于网络的指导,我们开发了VIC工具,该工具使用多媒体和其他数字功能来改进当前的IC流程。该工具是基于以用户为中心的设计流程和 Mayer 的多媒体学习认知理论开发的。本研究是一项随机对照试验,比较VIC与标准纸质同意书的可行性,以了解交互式数字同意的影响。参与者从康涅狄格州纽黑文市耶鲁纽黑文医院温彻斯特胸部诊所招募,健康个体通过传单从社区招募。在这项由协调员协助的试验中,参与者被随机分配使用iPad上的VIC或传统纸质同意书完成IC流程。研究在温彻斯特胸部诊所进行,结果通过协调员管理的问卷进行自我评估。

结果

本研究共招募了50名参与者(VIC组,n = 25;纸质组,n = 25)。两组参与者的理解程度都很高。VIC组参与者报告了更高的满意度、更高的易用性感知、更高的独立完成同意书的能力以及更短的完成同意流程的感知时间。

结论

VIC中使用动态、交互式视听元素可能会提高参与者满意度并促进IC流程。我们认为,在正在进行的真实世界研究而非假设性研究中使用VIC提高了我们研究结果的可靠性,这证明了VIC在提高研究参与者理解和IC整体流程方面的潜力。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02537886;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02537886

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/5f28921d772e/formative_v5i10e20458_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/863952660ef9/formative_v5i10e20458_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/3aee0540096b/formative_v5i10e20458_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/5f28921d772e/formative_v5i10e20458_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/863952660ef9/formative_v5i10e20458_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/3aee0540096b/formative_v5i10e20458_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/8564662/5f28921d772e/formative_v5i10e20458_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing a Multimedia Digital Informed Consent Tool With Traditional Paper-Based Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial.多媒体数字知情同意工具与传统纸质方法的比较:随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 19;5(10):e20458. doi: 10.2196/20458.
2
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
3
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.提高研究参与者对研究知情同意理解的干预措施:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1593-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.
4
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care.用于预防性医疗保健的手机短信服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007457.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
7
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
8
Self-Set Goals: Autistic Adults Facilitating Their Self-Determination Through Digitally Mediated Social Stories.自我设定目标:成年自闭症患者通过数字媒介社交故事促进自我决定
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):25-38. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0063. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
10
Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.为考虑参与临床试验的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD009736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Informed Consent for Older Adults in Emergency Department Research.急诊科研究中老年患者的数字知情同意书。
Appl Hum Factors Ergon Conf. 2023;78. doi: 10.54941/ahfe1003449.
2
Development of a Framework for the Enrollment of Children and Families in Emergency Department Research.儿童及其家庭参与急诊科研究的招募框架的制定。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Jan 9;6(1):100018. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100018. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Using dataflow diagrams to support research informed consent data management communications: participant perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review.知情同意过程中的数字工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 27;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8.
2
Building an Informed Consent Tool Starting with the Patient: The Patient-Centered Virtual Multimedia Interactive Informed Consent (VIC).从患者角度构建一份知情同意工具:以患者为中心的虚拟多媒体交互式知情同意书(VIC)。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:374-383. eCollection 2017.
3
A pragmatic randomized trial comparing tablet computer informed consent to traditional paper-based methods for an osteoporosis study.
使用数据流图支持基于研究知情同意的数据管理沟通:参与者视角
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):712-723. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf004.
4
Development of a novel multimedia tool for obtaining informed consent from survivors of sexual offenses and its comparison with the conventional method.开发一种用于从性犯罪幸存者处获取知情同意的新型多媒体工具及其与传统方法的比较。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Dec;80(Suppl 1):S84-S88. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Short-Form Video Informed Consent Compared With Written Consent for Adolescents and Young Adults: Randomized Experiment.短视频知情同意与书面知情同意在青少年和年轻人中的比较:随机试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 22;8:e57747. doi: 10.2196/57747.
6
A Review of the Design of Multimedia Patient Educational Materials in Low Back Pain Research.腰痛研究中多媒体患者教育材料的设计综述
Phys Ther Res. 2024;27(2):58-66. doi: 10.1298/ptr.R0032. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
An Evaluation of the Design of Multimedia Patient Education Materials in Musculoskeletal Health Care: Systematic Review.肌肉骨骼保健中多媒体患者教育材料设计的评估:系统评价
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Oct 15;11:e48154. doi: 10.2196/48154.
8
Enhancing patient informed consent in elective skin cancer surgeries: a comparative study of traditional and digital approaches in a German public hospital.提高择期皮肤癌手术中患者知情同意的质量:德国公立医院传统与数字方法的比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11225-3.
9
Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos.设计多媒体青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者教育材料:患者教育视频的可行性随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0297394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297394. eCollection 2024.
10
Current and Emerging Technologies to Address the Placebo Response Challenge in CNS Clinical Trials: Promise, Pitfalls, and Pathways Forward.应对中枢神经系统临床试验中安慰剂反应挑战的现有及新兴技术:前景、陷阱与未来之路
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2024 Mar 1;21(1-3):19-30. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
一项比较平板电脑知情同意书与传统纸质方法用于骨质疏松症研究的实用性随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Feb 17;3:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.02.003. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
4
A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent.一项关于医学实践研究的多媒体信息辅助工具的随机研究:对知情同意的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1177/1740774516669352. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research.iCONCUR:临床数据和生物样本用于研究的知情同意。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):380-387. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw115.
6
Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on the Efficacy of Multimedia Informed Consent for Patients Scheduled to Undergo Green-Light High-Performance System Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate.多媒体知情同意书用于计划接受前列腺绿激光高性能系统光选择性汽化术患者的疗效前瞻性随机对照研究
World J Mens Health. 2016 Apr;34(1):47-55. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2016.34.1.47. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
7
Telemedicine Provides Noninferior Research Informed Consent for Remote Study Enrollment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.远程医疗为远程研究入组提供非劣效性研究知情同意:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;23(7):759-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.12966. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
8
Informed consent in clinical research: Consensus recommendations for reform identified by an expert interview panel.临床研究中的知情同意:专家访谈小组确定的改革共识建议。
Clin Trials. 2015 Dec;12(6):692-5. doi: 10.1177/1740774515594362. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
9
A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.一项关于电子知情同意流程的随机对照试验。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):1-7. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552627. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
10
mHealth approaches to child obesity prevention: successes, unique challenges, and next directions.移动医疗在儿童肥胖预防中的应用:成功经验、独特挑战与未来方向
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Dec;3(4):406-15. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0222-3.