Esquivel Monica Kazlausky, Nigg Claudio R, Fialkowski Marie K, Braun Kathryn L, Li Fenfang, Novotny Rachel
Department of Human Nutrition, Food, and Animal Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Office of Public Health Studies, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 May;48(5):318-325.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.02.007.
To quantify the Head Start (HS) teacher mediating and moderating influence on the effect of a wellness policy intervention.
Intervention trial within a larger randomized community trial.
HS preschools in Hawaii.
Twenty-three HS classrooms located within 2 previously randomized communities.
Seven-month multi-component intervention with policy changes to food served and service style, initiatives for employee wellness, classroom activities for preschoolers promoting physical activity (PA) and healthy eating, and training and technical assistance.
The Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO) classroom scores and teacher questionnaires assessing on knowledge, beliefs, priorities, and misconceptions around child nutrition and changes in personal health behaviors and status were the main outcome measures.
Paired t tests and linear regression analysis tested the intervention effects on the classroom and mediating and moderating effects of the teacher variables on the classroom environment.
General linear model test showed greater intervention effect on the EPAO score where teachers reported higher than average improvements in their own health status and behaviors (estimate [SE] = -2.47 (0.78), P < .05).
Strategies to improve teacher health status and behaviors included in a multi-component policy intervention aimed at child obesity prevention may produce a greater effect on classroom environments.
量化“启智计划”(HS)教师对健康政策干预效果的中介和调节影响。
在一项更大规模的随机社区试验中的干预试验。
夏威夷的HS幼儿园。
位于之前随机划分的2个社区内的23个HS班级。
为期7个月的多组分干预,包括食品供应和服务方式的政策变化、员工健康倡议、促进学龄前儿童身体活动(PA)和健康饮食的课堂活动,以及培训和技术援助。
环境与政策评估及观察(EPAO)课堂评分以及教师问卷,问卷评估了关于儿童营养的知识、信念、优先事项和误解,以及个人健康行为和状况的变化,这些是主要结局指标。
配对t检验和线性回归分析测试了干预对课堂的影响以及教师变量对课堂环境的中介和调节影响。
一般线性模型测试显示,对于那些报告自身健康状况和行为改善高于平均水平的教师,干预对EPAO评分的影响更大(估计值[标准误]= -2.47(0.78),P <.05)。
旨在预防儿童肥胖的多组分政策干预中包含的改善教师健康状况和行为的策略,可能会对课堂环境产生更大影响。