Freeman Alex K, Thorne Chris J, Gaston C Louie, Shellard Richard, Neal Tom, Parry Michael C, Grimer Robert J, Jeys Lee
School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):634-640. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4858-4. Epub 2016 May 12.
Resection of pelvic and sacral tumors can cause severe blood loss, complications, and even postoperative death. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia has been used to mitigate blood loss after elective arthroplasty, but to our knowledge, it has not been studied as an approach that might make resection of pelvic and sacral tumors safer.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to compare the blood loss and blood product use for patients undergoing pelvic and sacral tumor surgery under standard anesthesia or hypotensive epidural anesthesia; (2) to assess the frequency of end-organ damage with the two techniques; and (3) to compare 90-day mortality between the two techniques.
Between 2000 and 2014, 285 major pelvic and sacral resections were performed at one center. A total of 174 (61%) had complete data sets for analysis of blood loss, transfusion use, complications, and mortality at 90 days. Of those, 102 (59%) underwent hypotensive epidural anesthesia, whereas the remainder received standard anesthetic care. The anesthetic approach was determined by the anesthetists in charge of the case with hypotensive epidural anesthesia exclusively performed by one of two subspecialty trained anesthetists as their routine for major pelvic or sacral surgery. The groups were comparable in terms of potential confounding variables such as age, gender, tumor volume, and operation performed. Hypotensive epidural anesthesia was defined as a technique using an extensive epidural block up to T2-3 dermatome, peripherally administered low-concentration intravenous adrenaline infusion, and using unimpeded spontaneous respiration to achieve controlled hypotension, precise rate control of the heart, and enhanced velocity of venous return, all aggregated thus to minimize blood loss during pelvic surgery while preserving vital perfusion. The groups were assessed for perioperative blood loss calculated from pre- and postsurgery hemoglobin and transfusion use as well as postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality at 90 days.
There was less mean blood loss in the hypotensive epidural anesthesia group (1457 mL, SD 1721, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1114-1801 versus 2421 mL, SD 2297, 95% CI, 1877-2965; p = 0.003). Patients in the hypotensive epidural anesthesia group on average received fewer packed red cell transfusions (2.7 units, SD 2.9, 95% CI, 2.1-3.2 versus 3.9 units, SD 4.4, 95% CI, 2.9-5.0; p = 0.03). There were no differences in the proportions of patients experiencing end-organ injury (7%, n = seven of 102 versus 6%, n = four of 72; p = 0.72). With the numbers available, there was no difference in 90-day mortality rate between groups (1.9%, n = two of 102 versus 1.3%, n = one of 72; p = 0.77).
We found that hypotensive epidural anesthesia resulted in less blood loss, fewer transfusions, and no apparent increase in serious complications in pelvic and sacral tumor surgery performed in the setting of a high-volume tertiary sarcoma referral hospital. We recommend that further collaborative studies be undertaken to confirm our results with hypotensive epidural anesthesia in surgery for pelvic tumors.
Level III, therapeutic study.
盆腔和骶骨肿瘤切除术可导致严重失血、并发症甚至术后死亡。低血压硬膜外麻醉已用于减轻择期关节置换术后的失血,但据我们所知,尚未将其作为一种可能使盆腔和骶骨肿瘤切除术更安全的方法进行研究。
问题/目的:本研究的目的是:(1)比较在标准麻醉或低血压硬膜外麻醉下接受盆腔和骶骨肿瘤手术患者的失血量和血制品使用情况;(2)评估两种技术导致终末器官损伤的频率;(3)比较两种技术的90天死亡率。
2000年至2014年期间,在一个中心进行了285例主要的盆腔和骶骨切除术。共有174例(61%)有完整数据集,可用于分析失血量、输血使用情况、并发症及90天死亡率。其中,102例(59%)接受了低血压硬膜外麻醉,其余患者接受标准麻醉护理。麻醉方法由负责该病例的麻醉师决定,低血压硬膜外麻醉仅由两名经过专科培训的麻醉师之一作为其盆腔或骶骨大手术的常规操作进行。两组在年龄、性别、肿瘤体积和手术等潜在混杂变量方面具有可比性。低血压硬膜外麻醉的定义为:采用广泛的硬膜外阻滞至T2-3皮节,外周给予低浓度静脉肾上腺素输注,并采用自主呼吸未受阻碍的方式实现控制性低血压、精确的心率控制以及增强静脉回流速度,所有这些综合起来可在盆腔手术期间尽量减少失血,同时维持重要灌注。评估两组患者围手术期的失血量(根据术前和术后血红蛋白计算)、输血使用情况以及术后并发症、发病率和90天死亡率。
低血压硬膜外麻醉组的平均失血量较少(1457 mL,标准差1721,95%置信区间[CI],1114 - 1801,而另一组为2421 mL,标准差2297,95% CI,1877 - 2965;p = 0.003)。低血压硬膜外麻醉组患者平均接受的浓缩红细胞输注量较少(2.7单位,标准差2.9,95% CI,2.