Yin Ping, Sun Chao, Wang Sicong, Chen Lei, Hong Nan
Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Pharmaceuticals Diagnosis, GE Healthcare (China), Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 25;11:752672. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.752672. eCollection 2021.
Patients with pelvic and sacral tumors are prone to massive blood loss (MBL) during surgery, which may endanger their lives.
This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using deep neural network (DNN) and radiomics nomogram (RN) based on 3D computed tomography (CT) features and clinical characteristics to predict the intraoperative MBL of pelvic and sacral tumors.
This single-center retrospective analysis included 810 patients with pelvic and sacral tumors. 1316 CT and CT enhanced radiomics features were extracted. RN1 and RN2 were constructed by random grouping and time node grouping, respectively. The DNN models were constructed for comparison with RN. Clinical factors associated with the MBL were also evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to evaluate different models.
Radscore, tumor type, tumor location, and sex were significant predictors of the MBL of pelvic and sacral tumors ( < 0.05), of which radscore (OR, ranging from 2.109 to 4.706, < 0.001) was the most important. The clinical-DNN and clinical-RN performed better than DNN and RN. The best-performing clinical-DNN model based on CT features exhibited an AUC of 0.92 and an ACC of 0.97 in the training set, and an AUC of 0.92 and an ACC of 0.75 in the validation set.
The clinical-DNN and clinical-RN had good performance in predicting the MBL of pelvic and sacral tumors, which could be used for clinical decision-making.
盆腔和骶骨肿瘤患者在手术过程中容易出现大量失血(MBL),这可能危及生命。
本研究旨在确定基于三维计算机断层扫描(CT)特征和临床特征,使用深度神经网络(DNN)和放射组学列线图(RN)预测盆腔和骶骨肿瘤术中MBL的可行性。
本单中心回顾性分析纳入了810例盆腔和骶骨肿瘤患者。提取了1316个CT及CT增强放射组学特征。分别通过随机分组和时间节点分组构建了RN1和RN2。构建DNN模型以与RN进行比较。还评估了与MBL相关的临床因素。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和准确率(ACC)来评估不同模型。
Radscore、肿瘤类型、肿瘤位置和性别是盆腔和骶骨肿瘤MBL的显著预测因素(<0.05),其中Radscore(OR范围为2.109至4.706,<0.001)最为重要。临床-DNN和临床-RN的表现优于DNN和RN。基于CT特征的表现最佳的临床-DNN模型在训练集中的AUC为0.92,ACC为0.97,在验证集中的AUC为0.92,ACC为0.75。
临床-DNN和临床-RN在预测盆腔和骶骨肿瘤的MBL方面具有良好性能,可用于临床决策。