Suppr超能文献

以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类简版核心集》为参照,患者报告的结局指标能否描述腰痛患者的功能状况?

Do Patient-Reported Outcome Measures describe functioning in patients with low back pain, using the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set as a reference?

作者信息

Ibsen Charlotte, Schiøttz-Christensen Berit, Melchiorsen Hanne, Nielsen Claus Vinther, Maribo Thomas

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Section of Clinical, Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Aarhus University and DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, P.P. Oerums Gade 11, 1B, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2016 Jul 18;48(7):618-24. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2100.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To link the items in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and pain scores, to the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for low back pain, and to examine the extent to which a clinician's assessment of patients' problems according to the Brief ICF Core Set correlates with the scores of matching items from the PROMs.

METHODS

The PROMs were linked to the Brief ICF Core Set for low back pain. Secondly, a cross-sectional study was conducted including 70 patients with low back pain. The patients completed the PROMs, and the Brief ICF Core Set for low back pain was assessed by a clinician using qualifiers.

RESULTS

The items in the PROMs were successfully linked to the ICF. Twelve of the 38 unique ICF categories derived from the PROMs were covered by the Brief ICF Core Set (34%). A weak correlation was found between the patients' responses and the clinician's assessment.

CONCLUSION

The selected PROMs do not cover the prototypical spectrum of problems encountered in patients with low back pain as defined by the Brief ICF Core Set. The clinical assessment of patients' problems according to the Brief ICF Core Set does not correlate with the scores of matching items from the PROMs.

摘要

目的

将患者报告结局量表(PROMs)中的项目(罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷、简短健康调查36项量表[SF - 36]和疼痛评分)与腰痛的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)简要核心集相联系,并检验临床医生根据ICF简要核心集对患者问题的评估与PROMs中匹配项目得分的相关程度。

方法

将PROMs与腰痛的ICF简要核心集相联系。其次,进行了一项横断面研究,纳入70例腰痛患者。患者完成PROMs,临床医生使用限定词对腰痛的ICF简要核心集进行评估。

结果

PROMs中的项目成功与ICF相联系。从PROMs中得出的38个独特ICF类别中有12个被ICF简要核心集涵盖(34%)。患者的回答与临床医生的评估之间存在弱相关性。

结论

所选的PROMs未涵盖ICF简要核心集所定义的腰痛患者遇到的典型问题范围。根据ICF简要核心集对患者问题进行的临床评估与PROMs中匹配项目的得分不相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验