Kim Won Hwa, Chang Jung Min, Koo Hye Ryoung, Seo Mirinae, Bae Min Sun, Lee Joongyub, Moon Woo Kyung
1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acta Radiol. 2017 Feb;58(2):148-155. doi: 10.1177/0284185116647211. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Background Although digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an emerging technique yielding higher sensitivity and specificity compared to digital mammography (DM) alone, relative contribution of prior mammograms on the interpretation of DBT combined with DM has not been investigated. Purpose To retrospectively compare the diagnostic performances of DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms. Material and Methods Three breast radiologists independently reviewed images of 116 patients with 24 cancers in the sequential order of DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories. Results The average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms were 0.712, 0.777, and 0.816, respectively. Adding prior mammograms did not significantly affect the AUC of DM + DBT ( P = 0.108), whereas adding DBT significantly increased the AUC of DM ( P = 0.009). Sensitivity for DM, DM + DBT, and DM + DBT with prior mammograms was 58.3%, 69.4%, and 69.4%, and specificities were 84.1%, 85.9%, and 93.8%, respectively. Addition of DBT significantly increased the sensitivity ( P = 0.0090) of DM. Prior mammograms significantly improved the specificity of DM + DBT ( P = 0.0004), whereas adding prior mammogram did not affect sensitivity of DM + DBT ( P = 1.000). Conclusion DBT significantly increases the overall sensitivity and diagnostic performance of DM. Prior mammograms significantly increase the specificity of DM + DBT but have no significant effect on sensitivity and overall diagnostic performance.
尽管数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)是一种新兴技术,与单纯数字乳腺摄影(DM)相比具有更高的敏感性和特异性,但既往乳腺摄影对DBT联合DM解读的相对贡献尚未得到研究。目的:回顾性比较DM、DM + DBT以及DM + DBT联合既往乳腺摄影的诊断性能。材料与方法:三位乳腺放射科医生按照DM、DM + DBT、DM + DBT联合既往乳腺摄影的顺序,使用乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评估类别,独立回顾了116例患有24例癌症患者的图像。结果:DM、DM + DBT以及DM + DBT联合既往乳腺摄影的平均受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积分别为0.712、0.777和0.816。添加既往乳腺摄影对DM + DBT的AUC没有显著影响(P = 0.108),而添加DBT显著增加了DM的AUC(P = 0.009)。DM、DM + DBT以及DM + DBT联合既往乳腺摄影的敏感性分别为58.3%、69.4%和69.4%,特异性分别为84.1%、85.9%和93.8%。添加DBT显著提高了DM的敏感性(P = 0.0090)。既往乳腺摄影显著提高了DM + DBT的特异性(P = 0.0004),而添加既往乳腺摄影对DM + DBT的敏感性没有影响(P = 1.000)。结论:DBT显著提高了DM的总体敏感性和诊断性能。既往乳腺摄影显著提高了DM + DBT的特异性,但对敏感性和总体诊断性能没有显著影响。