Suppr超能文献

抗血小板治疗相关自发性脑出血急性卒中后血小板输注与标准治疗(PATCH):一项随机、开放标签、3 期试验。

Platelet transfusion versus standard care after acute stroke due to spontaneous cerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy (PATCH): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Université Lille, Inserm U1171, Degenerative and Vascular Cognitive Disorders, CHU Lille, Department of Neurology, Lille, France.

出版信息

Lancet. 2016 Jun 25;387(10038):2605-2613. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30392-0. Epub 2016 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion after acute spontaneous primary intracerebral haemorrhage in people taking antiplatelet therapy might reduce death or dependence by reducing the extent of the haemorrhage. We aimed to investigate whether platelet transfusion with standard care, compared with standard care alone, reduced death or dependence after intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet therapy use.

METHODS

We did this multicentre, open-label, masked-endpoint, randomised trial at 60 hospitals in the Netherlands, UK, and France. We enrolled adults within 6 h of supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage symptom onset if they had used antiplatelet therapy for at least 7 days beforehand and had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of at least 8. With use of a secure web-based system that concealed allocation and used biased coin randomisation, study collaborators randomly assigned participants (1:1; stratified by hospital and type of antiplatelet therapy) to receive either standard care or standard care with platelet transfusion within 90 min of diagnostic brain imaging. Participants and local investigators giving interventions were not masked to treatment allocation, but allocation was concealed from outcome assessors and investigators analysing data. The primary outcome was shift towards death or dependence rated on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months, and analysed by ordinal logistic regression, adjusted for stratification variables and the Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat and as-treated populations. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1303, and is now closed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 4, 2009, and Oct 8, 2015, 41 sites enrolled 190 participants. 97 participants were randomly assigned to platelet transfusion and 93 to standard care. The odds of death or dependence at 3 months were higher in the platelet transfusion group than in the standard care group (adjusted common odds ratio 2·05, 95% CI 1·18-3·56; p=0·0114). 40 (42%) participants who received platelet transfusion had a serious adverse event during their hospital stay, as did 28 (29%) who received standard care. 23 (24%) participants assigned to platelet transfusion and 16 (17%) assigned to standard care died during hospital stay.

INTERPRETATION

Platelet transfusion seems inferior to standard care for people taking antiplatelet therapy before intracerebral haemorrhage. Platelet transfusion cannot be recommended for this indication in clinical practice.

FUNDING

The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Sanquin Blood Supply, Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland, French Ministry of Health.

摘要

背景

对于正在服用抗血小板药物的急性自发性原发性脑出血患者,输注血小板可能会通过减少出血程度来降低死亡率或依赖性。我们旨在研究与单独接受标准治疗相比,血小板输注联合标准治疗是否可以降低与抗血小板药物使用相关的脑出血后的死亡率或依赖性。

方法

我们在荷兰、英国和法国的 60 家医院进行了这项多中心、开放性标签、盲终点、随机试验。我们招募了在脑出血症状发作后 6 小时内的成年人,如果他们在之前至少使用了 7 天的抗血小板药物,并且格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分至少为 8 分。使用安全的基于网络的系统,该系统隐藏了分配并使用偏置硬币随机化,研究合作者随机将参与者(1:1;按医院和抗血小板治疗类型分层)分配接受标准治疗或在诊断性脑部成像后 90 分钟内接受血小板输注的标准治疗。给予干预措施的参与者和当地研究人员对治疗分配不设盲,但结果评估者和分析数据的研究人员对分配设盲。主要结局是改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分在 3 个月时向死亡或依赖方向转变,采用有序逻辑回归进行分析,调整了分层变量和脑出血评分。主要分析是在意向治疗人群中进行的,安全性分析是在意向治疗人群和实际治疗人群中进行的。该试验已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,编号为 NTR1303,现已关闭。

结果

2009 年 2 月 4 日至 2015 年 10 月 8 日,41 个地点共招募了 190 名参与者。97 名参与者被随机分配接受血小板输注,93 名参与者接受标准治疗。与标准治疗组相比,血小板输注组在 3 个月时死亡或依赖的可能性更高(调整后的常见比值比 2.05,95%CI 1.18-3.56;p=0.0114)。在住院期间,40 名(42%)接受血小板输注的参与者发生了严重不良事件,28 名(29%)接受标准治疗的参与者发生了严重不良事件。23 名(24%)被分配接受血小板输注的参与者和 16 名(17%)被分配接受标准治疗的参与者在住院期间死亡。

解释

对于脑出血前正在服用抗血小板药物的患者,血小板输注似乎不如标准治疗。血小板输注不能作为这种适应症的推荐在临床实践中使用。

资金

荷兰健康研究与发展组织、Sanquin 血液供应、苏格兰胸部心脏和中风、法国卫生部。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验