Gundlund Anna, Fosbøl Emil Loldrup, Kim Sunghee, Fonarow Gregg C, Gersh Bernard J, Kowey Peter R, Hylek Elaine, Mahaffey Kenneth W, Thomas Laine, Piccini Jonathan P, Peterson Eric D
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Am Heart J. 2016 May;175:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
We addressed whether patients with a family history of atrial fibrillation (AF) were diagnosed as having AF earlier in life, were more symptomatic, and had worse outcomes compared with those without a family history of AF.
Using the ORBIT-AF, we compared symptoms and disease characteristics in those with and without a family history of AF. A family history of AF was defined as AF in a first-degree family member and obtained by patient self-reporting. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to compare the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes, AF progression, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause death.
Among 9,999 patients with AF from 176 US outpatient clinics, 1,481 (14.8%) had a family history of AF. Relative to those without, those with a family history of AF developed AF 5 years earlier on average (median age 65 vs 70 years, P < .01), with less comorbidity, and had more severe AF-related symptoms. No differences were found between the 2 groups in the risk of AF progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.14), stroke, non-central nervous system embolism, or transient ischemic attack (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.67-1.34), all-cause hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.12), and all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86-1.27).
Patients with a family history of AF developed AF at a younger age, had less comorbidity, and were more symptomatic. Once AF developed, no significantly increased risks of AF progression and thromboembolism were associated with a family history of AF compared with no family history.
我们探讨了与无房颤(AF)家族史的患者相比,有房颤家族史的患者是否在生命早期被诊断为房颤、症状更明显且预后更差。
利用ORBIT-AF,我们比较了有和无房颤家族史患者的症状及疾病特征。房颤家族史定义为一级家庭成员中有房颤,通过患者自我报告获取。进行多变量Cox比例风险分析以比较心血管结局、房颤进展、全因住院和全因死亡的发生率。
在美国176家门诊诊所的9999例房颤患者中,1481例(14.8%)有房颤家族史。与无房颤家族史的患者相比,有房颤家族史的患者平均早5年发生房颤(中位年龄65岁对70岁,P <.01),合并症较少,且房颤相关症状更严重。两组在房颤进展风险(调整后风险比[HR] 0.98,95%置信区间0.85 - 1.14)、中风、非中枢神经系统栓塞或短暂性脑缺血发作(调整后HR 0.95,95%置信区间0.67 - 1.34)、全因住院(调整后HR 1.03,95%置信区间0.94 - 1.12)和全因死亡(调整后HR 1.05,95%置信区间0.86 - 1.27)方面未发现差异。
有房颤家族史的患者发生房颤的年龄更小,合并症较少,且症状更明显。一旦发生房颤,与无家族史相比,房颤家族史与房颤进展和血栓栓塞风险无显著增加相关。