文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

GARFIELD-AF 评分用于预测房颤患者 2 年内的死亡、卒中和出血风险。

GARFIELD-AF risk score for mortality, stroke, and bleeding within 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.

Thrombosis Research Institute, Manresa Road, London, SW3 6LR, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Mar 2;8(2):214-227. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab028.


DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab028
PMID:33892489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8888127/
Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) integrated risk tool predicts mortality, non-haemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding for up to 2 years after new-onset AF and to assess how this risk tool performs compared with CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED. METHODS AND RESULTS: Potential predictors of events included demographic and clinical characteristics, choice of treatment, and lifestyle factors. A Cox proportional hazards model was identified for each outcome by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods. Indices were evaluated in comparison with CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED risk predictors. Models were validated internally and externally in ORBIT-AF and Danish nationwide registries. Among the 52 080 patients enrolled in GARFIELD-AF, 52 032 had follow-up data. The GARFIELD-AF risk tool outperformed CHA2DS2-VASc for all-cause mortality in all cohorts. The GARFIELD-AF risk score was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for non-haemorrhagic stroke, and it outperformed HAS-BLED for major bleeding in internal validation and in the Danish AF cohort. In very low- to low-risk patients [CHA2DS2-VASc 0 or 1 (men) and 1 or 2 (women)], the GARFIELD-AF risk score offered strong discriminatory value for all the endpoints when compared to CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED. The GARFIELD-AF tool also included the effect of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, thus allowing clinicians to compare the expected outcome of different anticoagulant treatment decisions [i.e. no OAC, non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants, or VKAs]. CONCLUSIONS: The GARFIELD-AF risk tool outperformed CHA2DS2-VASc at predicting death and non-haemorrhagic stroke, and it outperformed HAS-BLED for major bleeding in overall as well as in very low- to low-risk group patients with AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF: NCT01090362, ORBIT-AF I: NCT01165710; ORBIT-AF II: NCT01701817.

摘要

目的:确定新发性心房颤动(AF)后 2 年内,全球抗凝剂注册在 FIELD-AF(GARFIELD-AF)综合风险工具是否能预测死亡率、非出血性卒中和全身性栓塞以及大出血,并评估该风险工具与 CHA2DS2-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 相比表现如何。

方法和结果:事件的潜在预测因子包括人口统计学和临床特征、治疗选择和生活方式因素。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子方法为每种结局确定 Cox 比例风险模型。通过与 CHA2DS2-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 风险预测因子比较,评估指数。在 ORBIT-AF 和丹麦全国登记处内部和外部验证模型。在 GARFIELD-AF 中登记的 52080 名患者中,52032 名患者有随访数据。在所有队列中,GARFIELD-AF 风险工具在全因死亡率方面均优于 CHA2DS2-VASc。在非出血性卒中和大出血方面,GARFIELD-AF 风险评分优于 CHA2DS2-VASc,在内部验证和丹麦 AF 队列中,优于 HAS-BLED。在极低至低风险患者[CHA2DS2-VASc 0 或 1(男性)和 1 或 2(女性)]中,与 CHA2DS2-VASc 和 HAS-BLED 相比,GARFIELD-AF 风险评分在所有终点均具有很强的判别能力。GARFIELD-AF 工具还包括口服抗凝剂(OAC)治疗的效果,因此允许临床医生比较不同抗凝治疗决策的预期结果[即无 OAC、非维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)口服抗凝剂或 VKA]。

结论:GARFIELD-AF 风险工具在预测死亡和非出血性卒中和大出血方面优于 CHA2DS2-VASc,在 AF 患者的整体和极低至低风险组中,优于 HAS-BLED。

临床试验注册:网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。GARFIELD-AF 的独特标识符:NCT01090362,ORBIT-AF I:NCT01165710;ORBIT-AF II:NCT01701817。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/c3612595594c/qcab028f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/5c352e62919e/qcab028fig1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/e4e3d92fa7db/qcab028f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/1f525b947bee/qcab028f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/b8f5888ba5eb/qcab028f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/c3612595594c/qcab028f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/5c352e62919e/qcab028fig1g.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/e4e3d92fa7db/qcab028f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/1f525b947bee/qcab028f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/b8f5888ba5eb/qcab028f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3637/8888127/c3612595594c/qcab028f4.jpg

相似文献

[1]
GARFIELD-AF risk score for mortality, stroke, and bleeding within 2 years in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022-3-2

[2]
Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.

BMJ Open. 2017-12-21

[3]
Atrial fibrillation outcomes in patients from Asia and non-Asia countries: insights from GARFIELD-AF.

Open Heart. 2025-2-6

[4]
Stroke-bleeding risk score pairings within individuals in the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry.

Int J Cardiol. 2025-2-15

[5]
Emulation of ARISTOTLE and ROCKET AF trials in real-world atrial fibrillation patients results in similar efficacy and safety as original landmark trials: insights from the GARFIELD-AF registry.

Open Heart. 2025-1-19

[6]
Middle East Treatment Strategies and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Follow-up Data from Garfield-AF Study.

Adv Ther. 2021-5

[7]
Stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation with CHA2DS2-VASC risk score of one: the Norwegian AFNOR study.

Eur Heart J. 2024-1-1

[8]
Ischemic stroke risk in East Asian patients with CHADS-VASc score of 1: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017-2

[9]
Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-8-8

[10]
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and risk of stroke, hospitalized bleeding and death in Medicare beneficiaries.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
One-Year Mortality in Hospitalized, Frail Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation on Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: Impact of Stroke and Bleeding Events.

Drugs Aging. 2025-7-9

[2]
Predicting Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Machine Learning Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.

J Clin Med. 2025-5-25

[3]
Multifactorial Risk Stratification in Patients with Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Analysis.

Life (Basel). 2025-5-14

[4]
Emulation of ARISTOTLE and ROCKET AF trials in real-world atrial fibrillation patients results in similar efficacy and safety as original landmark trials: insights from the GARFIELD-AF registry.

Open Heart. 2025-1-19

[5]
Bleeding Complications of Anticoagulation Therapy in Clinical Practice-Epidemiology and Management: Review of the Literature.

Biomedicines. 2024-10-1

[6]
Anticoagulation Patterns in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Developing Country: Insights from the Stroke Registry in Vietnam.

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024-8-30

[7]
Gender and contemporary risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation.

Eur Heart J. 2024-9-29

[8]
The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Ischemic Stroke in Cognitive Decline.

J Clin Med. 2024-7-14

[9]
Comparison of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran for effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024-7-16

[10]
Impact of patient selection in clinical trials: application of ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE criteria in GARFIELD-AF.

Open Heart. 2024-7-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Changing paradigms: from prevention of thromboembolic events to improved survival in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Europace. 2021-6-7

[2]
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC.

Eur Heart J. 2021-2-1

[3]
GARFIELD-AF model for prediction of stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation: a Danish nationwide validation study.

BMJ Open. 2019-11-11

[4]
Anticoagulation risk assessment for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: A clinical review.

Vasc Med. 2019-2-12

[5]
Early Risks of Death, Stroke/Systemic Embolism, and Major Bleeding in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.

Circulation. 2019-2-5

[6]
Risk factors for death, stroke, and bleeding in 28,628 patients from the GARFIELD-AF registry: Rationale for comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation.

PLoS One. 2018-1-25

[7]
Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.

BMJ Open. 2017-12-21

[8]
Evolving quality standards for large-scale registries: the GARFIELD-AF experience.

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017-4-1

[9]
Meta-analysis of ATRIA versus CHADS-VASc for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Int J Cardiol. 2017-1-15

[10]
Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ. 2016-9-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索