• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通人群食管腺癌风险预测模型的系统评价

A Systematic Review of Risk Prediction Models for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the General Population.

作者信息

Zhao Liyan, Chen Binbin, Lagergren Jesper, Xie Shao-Hua

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Gastro Hep Adv. 2025 Jun 21;4(10):100737. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100737. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100737
PMID:40917762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12409981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Risk prediction models can identify individuals at high risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This systematic review aimed to critically appraise the available models for projecting absolute risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the general population.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies of risk prediction models for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data were extracted from eligible studies according to the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool.

RESULTS

We identified 7 studies. Age, sex, gastroesophageal reflux disease, body mass index, and tobacco smoking were the most common predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged between 0.76 and 0.88 in the derivation datasets. The models based on 2 cohort studies showed good agreement between observed and predicted risks. All studies had at least 1 domain with high risk of bias, primarily attributable to methodological shortcomings in the data analysis.

CONCLUSION

Most risk prediction models showed good performance in identifying individuals at high risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Validation in external populations and cost-effectiveness evaluation are needed before these models can be applied in public health and clinical practice.

摘要

背景与目的

风险预测模型能够识别出食管腺癌高风险个体。本系统评价旨在严格评估用于预测普通人群食管腺癌绝对风险的现有模型。

方法

我们检索了Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以查找关于食管腺癌风险预测模型的研究。根据预测模型研究系统评价的严格评价和数据提取清单,从符合条件的研究中提取数据。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险和适用性。

结果

我们纳入了7项研究。年龄、性别、胃食管反流病、体重指数和吸烟是最常见的预测因素。在推导数据集中,受试者工作特征曲线下面积在0.76至0.88之间。基于2项队列研究的模型显示观察到的风险与预测风险之间具有良好的一致性。所有研究至少有1个领域存在高偏倚风险,主要归因于数据分析中的方法学缺陷。

结论

大多数风险预测模型在识别食管腺癌高风险个体方面表现良好。在这些模型能够应用于公共卫生和临床实践之前,需要在外部人群中进行验证并进行成本效益评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a95/12409981/e60831687d02/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a95/12409981/5d984e303827/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a95/12409981/e60831687d02/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a95/12409981/5d984e303827/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a95/12409981/e60831687d02/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Risk Prediction Models for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the General Population.普通人群食管腺癌风险预测模型的系统评价
Gastro Hep Adv. 2025 Jun 21;4(10):100737. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100737. eCollection 2025.
2
Prognostic models for radiation-induced complications after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.头颈部癌患者放疗后放射性并发症的预后模型
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Sep 10;9(9):CD014745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014745.pub2.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub7.
8
Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.全髋关节置换术和表面置换术治疗终末期髋关节炎所致疼痛和残疾(技术评估指南2和44综述):系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(10):1-668, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19100.
9
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Models to Predict Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Risk.基于电子健康记录的机器学习模型在预测巴雷特食管和食管腺癌风险中的开发。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;14(10):e00637. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000637.
2
Risk Prediction Model for Esophageal Cancer Among General Population: A Systematic Review.一般人群食管癌风险预测模型:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;9:680967. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680967. eCollection 2021.
3
International variation in oesophageal and gastric cancer survival 2012-2014: differences by histological subtype and stage at diagnosis (an ICBP SURVMARK-2 population-based study).
2012-2014 年食管和胃癌生存的国际差异:组织学亚型和诊断时分期的差异(一项基于 ICBP SURVMARK-2 的人群研究)。
Gut. 2022 Aug;71(8):1532-1543. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325266. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
Trends and projections in the incidence of oesophageal cancer in the Netherlands: An age-period-cohort analysis from 1989 to 2041.荷兰食管癌发病率的趋势和预测:1989 年至 2041 年的年龄-时期-队列分析。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Feb 1;150(3):420-430. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33836. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
5
Risk prediction models for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and critical appraisal.食管癌风险预测模型:系统评价与批判性评估。
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(20):7265-7276. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4226. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
Validation of Tools for Predicting Incident Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Esophagogastric Junction.预测食管或食管胃交界腺癌发病工具的验证
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):949-957. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001255.
7
Circulating Levels of Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers and Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett Esophagus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.炎症和代谢生物标志物的循环水平与食管腺癌和巴雷特食管的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Nov;29(11):2109-2118. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0572. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
Interactive decision support for esophageal adenocarcinoma screening and surveillance.食管腺癌筛查和监测的交互式决策支持。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1022-0.
9
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.
10
Information on Genetic Variants Does Not Increase Identification of Individuals at Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Compared to Clinical Risk Factors.遗传变异信息并不比临床危险因素更能识别患食管腺癌的个体。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):43-45. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Sep 19.