Simino Giovana Paula Rezende, Marra Lays Pires, Andrade Eli Iola Gurgel de, Acúrcio Francisco de Assis, Reis Ilka Afonso, De Araújo Vânia Eloisa, Cherchiglia Mariângela Leal
a Basic Nursing Departament, Nursing School , Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte , Brazil.
b Social Pharmacy Departament , Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte , Brazil.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;9(9):1183-94. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2016.1190271. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are adverse effects responsible for worsening quality of life in cancer patients. To assess the efficacy, safety and effectiveness of serotonin receptor antagonist in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, comparing ondansetron with granisetron, dolasetron, tropisetron and palonosetron.
Systematic review and meta-analysis. The data were collected using CINAHL; CENTRAL; MEDLINE/PubMed; and LILACS databases; grey literature; and manual search. The methodological quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale; Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. The search was completed in November, 2015. 26 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Ondansetron exhibited similar efficacy than granisetron and tropisetron, as well as greater efficacy than dolasetron for acute vomiting. Palonosetron exhibited greater efficacy than ondansetron for delayed nausea and acute and delayed vomiting. The comparison of granisetron with ondansetron in the cohort studies showed no difference. Expert commentary: In this review, palonosetron had increased efficiency compared with ondansetron, except in the subgroup analysis and acute nausea. Few cohort studies have been published addressing this topic.
化疗引起的恶心和呕吐是导致癌症患者生活质量下降的不良反应。为评估5-羟色胺受体拮抗剂在接受化疗的癌症患者中的疗效、安全性和有效性,对昂丹司琼与格拉司琼、多潘立酮、托烷司琼和帕洛诺司琼进行比较。
系统评价和荟萃分析。数据通过CINAHL、CENTRAL、MEDLINE/PubMed和LILACS数据库、灰色文献以及手工检索收集。使用改良的雅达量表、Cochrane协作网评估随机临床试验偏倚风险的工具以及纽卡斯尔-渥太华观察性研究量表评估方法学质量。检索于2015年11月完成。荟萃分析纳入了26项研究。昂丹司琼在急性呕吐方面与格拉司琼和托烷司琼疗效相似,且比多潘立酮疗效更佳。帕洛诺司琼在延迟性恶心以及急性和延迟性呕吐方面比昂丹司琼疗效更佳。队列研究中格拉司琼与昂丹司琼的比较未显示出差异。专家评论:在本综述中,除亚组分析和急性恶心外,帕洛诺司琼与昂丹司琼相比效率有所提高。针对该主题发表的队列研究较少。