Suppr超能文献

[毛细血管透析器的再处理]

[Reprocessing of capillary dialyzers].

作者信息

Stetsiuk E A, Iarmolinskiĭ I S, Ponomareva V Iu, Makhlin N V

出版信息

Urol Nefrol (Mosk). 1989 Jan-Feb(1):55-9.

PMID:2718285
Abstract

Changes in biocompatibility parameters of the cuprophan membrane, used repeatedly after reprocessing, were assessed. It is demonstrated that when the dialyzer is applied for the second of third time, cuprophan membrane loses its ability to induce acute dialysis leucopenia, typical for first application. Repeatedly used dialyzers also failed to cause bone-marrow irritation, which at first use induced a release of juvenile neutrophils into the circulation. Prior to first application, 6 dialyzers were subjected to 3 reprocessing procedures each. In all three, the cellulose membrane did not lose its ability to cause acute leucopenia. Therefore, the chemical reagents used in reprocessing (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite and formaldehyde) are not the cause of membrane's loss of ability to induce leucopenia. Used for 3 times running, capillary dialyzers do not essentially lose their effective capillary volume. To determine whether the dialyzer is suitable for repeated use, both visual and objective check-up of the device is necessary. Some aspects of reprocessing technology are discussed.

摘要

对再处理后反复使用的铜仿膜生物相容性参数的变化进行了评估。结果表明,当透析器第二次或第三次使用时,铜仿膜失去了诱导急性透析白细胞减少的能力,而首次使用时这种现象很典型。反复使用的透析器也不会引起骨髓刺激,首次使用时会诱导幼稚中性粒细胞释放到循环中。在首次使用前,对6个透析器分别进行了3次再处理程序。在所有这三种情况下,纤维素膜导致急性白细胞减少的能力并未丧失。因此,再处理中使用的化学试剂(过氧化氢、次氯酸钠和甲醛)不是膜失去诱导白细胞减少能力的原因。连续使用3次后,毛细管透析器的有效毛细管容积基本不会损失。为了确定透析器是否适合重复使用,对该装置进行目视和客观检查都是必要的。文中讨论了再处理技术的一些方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验