Bruehl Stephen, Burns John W, Gupta Rajnish, Buvanendran Asokumar, Chont Melissa, Orlowska Daria, Schuster Erik, France Christopher R
*Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN Departments of †Behavioral Science ‡Anesthesiology, Rush University, Chicago, IL §Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
Clin J Pain. 2017 Jan;33(1):12-20. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000389.
Clinically feasible predictors of opioid analgesic responses for use in precision pain medicine protocols are needed. This study evaluated whether resting plasma β-endorphin (BE) levels predicted responses to an opioid analgesic, and whether chronic pain status or sex moderated these effects.
Participants included 73 individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and 88 pain-free controls, all using no daily opioid analgesics. Participants attended 2 identical laboratory sessions during which they received either intravenous morphine (0.08 mg/kg) or saline placebo, with blood samples obtained before drug administration to assay resting plasma BE levels. Once peak drug activity was achieved in each session, participants engaged in an ischemic forearm pain task (ISC) and a heat pain task. Morphine analgesic effects were derived reflecting the difference in pain outcomes between placebo and morphine conditions.
In hierarchical regressions, significant Type (CLBP vs. control)×BE interactions (Ps<0.05) were noted for morphine effects on ISC tolerance, ISC intratask pain ratings, and thermal VAS unpleasantness ratings. These interactions derived primarily from associations between higher BE levels and smaller morphine effects restricted to the CLBP subgroup. All other BE-related effects, including sex interactions, for predicting morphine analgesia failed to reach statistical significance.
BE was a predictor of morphine analgesia for only 3 out of 9 outcomes examined, with these effects moderated by chronic pain status but not sex. On the whole, results do not suggest that resting plasma BE levels are likely to be a clinically useful predictor of opioid analgesic responses.
在精准疼痛医学方案中,需要有临床可行的阿片类镇痛药反应预测指标。本研究评估静息血浆β-内啡肽(BE)水平是否能预测对阿片类镇痛药的反应,以及慢性疼痛状态或性别是否会调节这些效应。
参与者包括73名慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者和88名无疼痛对照者,均未每日使用阿片类镇痛药。参与者参加2次相同的实验室环节,期间他们分别接受静脉注射吗啡(0.08mg/kg)或生理盐水安慰剂,并在给药前采集血样以检测静息血浆BE水平。在每个环节达到药物活性峰值后,参与者进行缺血性前臂疼痛任务(ISC)和热痛任务。计算吗啡镇痛效果,反映安慰剂和吗啡条件下疼痛结果的差异。
在分层回归分析中,发现吗啡对ISC耐受性、ISC任务内疼痛评分和热视觉模拟评分(VAS)不愉快度评分的影响存在显著的类型(CLBP与对照)×BE交互作用(P<0.05)。这些交互作用主要源于较高的BE水平与仅限于CLBP亚组的较小吗啡效应之间的关联。所有其他与BE相关的预测吗啡镇痛的效应,包括性别交互作用,均未达到统计学显著性。
在所研究的9项结果中,BE仅对其中3项是吗啡镇痛的预测指标,且这些效应受慢性疼痛状态而非性别的调节。总体而言,结果并不表明静息血浆BE水平可能是阿片类镇痛药反应的临床有用预测指标。