Tovo-Rodrigues Luciana, Recamonde-Mendoza Mariana, Paixão-Côrtes Vanessa Rodrigues, Bruxel Estela M, Schuch Jaqueline B, Friedrich Deise C, Rohde Luis A, Hutz Mara H
Department of Genetics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016 Sep;171(6):848-60. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32455. Epub 2016 May 17.
Although new candidate genes for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Schizophrenia (SCZ), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Bipolar Disorder (BD) emerged from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), their underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Evidences of the involvement of intrinsically disordered proteins in diseases have grown in the last decade. These proteins lack tridimensional structure under physiological conditions and are involved in important cellular functions such as signaling, recognition and regulation. The aim of the present study was to identify the role and abundance of intrinsically disordered proteins in a set of psychiatric diseases and to test whether diseases are different regarding protein intrinsic disorder. Our hypothesis is that differences across psychiatric illnesses phenotypes and symptoms may arise from differences in intrinsic protein disorder content and properties of each group. A bioinformatics prediction of intrinsic disorder was performed in proteins retrieved based on top findings from GWAS, Copy Number Variation and candidate gene investigations for each disease. This approach revealed that about 80% of studied proteins presented long stretches of disorder. This amount was significantly higher than that observed in general eukaryotic proteins, and those involved in cardiovascular diseases. These results suggest that proteins with intrinsic disorder are a common feature of neurodevelopment and synaptic transmission processes which are potentially involved in the etiology of psychiatric diseases. Moreover, we identified differences between ADHD and ASD when the binary prediction of structure and putative binding sites were compared. These differences may be related to variation in symptom complexity between both diseases. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
尽管全基因组关联研究(GWAS)发现了自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、精神分裂症(SCZ)、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和双相情感障碍(BD)的新候选基因,但其潜在分子机制仍知之甚少。在过去十年中,关于内在无序蛋白参与疾病的证据不断增加。这些蛋白质在生理条件下缺乏三维结构,并参与重要的细胞功能,如信号传导、识别和调节。本研究的目的是确定内在无序蛋白在一组精神疾病中的作用和丰度,并测试不同疾病在蛋白质内在无序方面是否存在差异。我们的假设是,不同精神疾病的表型和症状差异可能源于每组内在蛋白无序含量和特性的差异。对基于每种疾病的GWAS、拷贝数变异和候选基因研究的顶级发现检索到的蛋白质进行了内在无序的生物信息学预测。该方法表明,约80%的研究蛋白质呈现长片段的无序状态。这一数量显著高于一般真核蛋白质以及参与心血管疾病的蛋白质中观察到的数量。这些结果表明,具有内在无序的蛋白质是神经发育和突触传递过程的共同特征,可能参与精神疾病的病因学。此外,当比较结构和假定结合位点的二元预测时,我们发现了ADHD和ASD之间的差异。这些差异可能与两种疾病症状复杂性的差异有关。© 2016威利期刊公司