Suppr超能文献

液相色谱法和超临界流体色谱法作为气相色谱法的替代技术用于尿液中合成代谢药物的快速筛查。

Liquid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography as alternative techniques to gas chromatography for the rapid screening of anabolic agents in urine.

作者信息

Desfontaine Vincent, Nováková Lucie, Ponzetto Federico, Nicoli Raul, Saugy Martial, Veuthey Jean-Luc, Guillarme Davy

机构信息

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Boulevard d'Yvoy 20, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 50005 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2016 Jun 17;1451:145-155. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 3.

Abstract

This work describes the development of two methods involving supported liquid extraction (SLE) sample treatment followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography or ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS and UHPSFC-MS/MS) for the screening of 43 anabolic agents in human urine. After evaluating different stationary phases, a polar-embedded C18 and a diol columns were selected for UHPLC-MS/MS and UHPSFC-MS/MS, respectively. Sample preparation, mobile phases and MS conditions were also finely tuned to achieve highest selectivity, chromatographic resolution and sensitivity. Then, the performance of these two methods was compared to the reference routine procedure for steroid analyses in anti-doping laboratories, which combines liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) followed by gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). For this purpose, urine samples spiked with the compounds of interest at five different concentrations were analyzed using the three analytical platforms. The retention and selectivity of the three techniques were very different, ensuring a good complementarity. However, the two new methods displayed numerous advantages. The overall procedure was much faster thanks to high throughput SLE sample treatment using 48-well plates and faster chromatographic analysis. Moreover, the highest sensitivity was attained using UHPLC-MS/MS with 98% of the doping agents detected at the lowest concentration level (0.1ng/mL), against 76% for UHPSFC-MS/MS and only 14% for GC-MS/MS. Finally, the weakest matrix effects were obtained with UHPSFC-MS/MS with 76% of the analytes displaying relative matrix effect between -20 and 20%, while the GC-MS/MS reference method displayed very strong matrix effects (over 100%) for all of the anabolic agents.

摘要

这项工作描述了两种方法的开发,这两种方法包括采用支持液液萃取(SLE)进行样品处理,然后结合超高效液相色谱或超高效超临界流体色谱与串联质谱(UHPLC-MS/MS和UHPSFC-MS/MS),用于筛查人尿中的43种合成代谢药物。在评估了不同的固定相之后,分别为UHPLC-MS/MS和UHPSFC-MS/MS选择了极性嵌入C18柱和二醇柱。还对样品制备、流动相和质谱条件进行了精细调整,以实现最高的选择性、色谱分辨率和灵敏度。然后,将这两种方法的性能与反兴奋剂实验室中类固醇分析的参考常规方法进行比较,该常规方法结合了液液萃取(LLE),然后是气相色谱与串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)。为此,使用这三种分析平台对添加了五种不同浓度目标化合物的尿液样本进行了分析。这三种技术的保留和选择性差异很大,确保了良好的互补性。然而,这两种新方法显示出许多优点。由于使用48孔板进行高通量SLE样品处理以及更快的色谱分析,整个过程要快得多。此外,使用UHPLC-MS/MS获得了最高的灵敏度,在最低浓度水平(0.1ng/mL)下检测到98%的兴奋剂,而UHPSFC-MS/MS为76%,GC-MS/MS仅为14%。最后,UHPSFC-MS/MS获得的基质效应最弱,76%的分析物显示相对基质效应在-20%至20%之间,而GC-MS/MS参考方法对所有合成代谢药物均显示出非常强的基质效应(超过100%)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验