• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算不同尺度土地利用对爱尔兰河流高生态状况的影响。

Estimating the effects of land use at different scales on high ecological status in Irish rivers.

机构信息

Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland.

Teagasc, Spatial Analysis Unit, Ashtown, Ireland.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:618-625. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.011
PMID:27185348
Abstract

High ecological status at river sites is an indicator of minimal disturbance from anthropogenic activities and the presence of ecologically important species and communities. However, a lack of clarity on what factors cause sites to lose high ecological status is limiting the ability to maintain the quality of these sites. Examination of ecological status records at 508 high status river sites throughout the Republic of Ireland revealed that 337 had fallen below high status at some point between 2001 and 2012 due to changes in invertebrate communities. A geographical information system was used to characterise land use and environmental variables in the catchment, riparian and reach areas upstream of the sites. The relationships between these variables at the three spatial scales and whether or not river sites had maintained high ecological status were then estimated by multiple logistic regression and propensity modelling. The results indicated that grassland at either catchment or riparian scales had a greater negative impact on high ecological status than at the reach scale. This effect appeared to be strongest for upland, steeply sloping rivers that are subject to high rainfall, possibly due to the presence of sensitive biota and/or a greater potential for erosion. These results highlighted the need for better management of grassland upstream of the high status sites, with a focus on river alterations and critical source areas of nutrients, sediments and pesticides that are hydrologically connected to the river. Sustainable management practices and land use planning in those areas will need to be considered carefully if the aim of maintaining high ecological status at river sites is to be achieved.

摘要

河流站点的高生态状况是指示人类活动干扰最小以及存在生态重要物种和群落的指标。然而,对于哪些因素导致站点失去高生态状况,还存在一些不明确的地方,这限制了维持这些站点质量的能力。对爱尔兰共和国 508 个高生态状况河流站点的生态状况记录进行检查后发现,由于无脊椎动物群落的变化,自 2001 年至 2012 年期间,有 337 个站点的生态状况已降至低水平。使用地理信息系统对流域、河岸带和站点上游河道区域的土地利用和环境变量进行了描述。然后,通过多项逻辑回归和倾向评分模型,对三个空间尺度上的这些变量与河流站点是否保持高生态状况之间的关系进行了估计。结果表明,与河道尺度相比,无论是在流域尺度还是河岸带尺度上,草地对高生态状况的负面影响更大。这种影响对于受到高降雨影响的高海拔、陡坡河流似乎最为强烈,这可能是由于存在敏感生物群和/或更大的侵蚀潜力。这些结果突出表明,需要更好地管理高生态状况站点上游的草地,重点关注与河流相连的河流改造和营养物质、沉积物和农药的关键源区。如果要实现维持河流站点高生态状况的目标,就需要仔细考虑这些地区的可持续管理实践和土地利用规划。

相似文献

1
Estimating the effects of land use at different scales on high ecological status in Irish rivers.估算不同尺度土地利用对爱尔兰河流高生态状况的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:618-625. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
2
Pressures at larger spatial scales strongly influence the ecological status of heavily modified river water bodies in Germany.在较大的空间尺度上,压力强烈影响着德国高度受干扰的河流水体的生态状况。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jun 1;454-455:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.096. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
Linking catchment characteristics and water chemistry with the ecological status of Irish rivers.将爱尔兰河流的集水区特征、水化学与生态状况联系起来。
Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.027.
4
Land use impacts on river health of Uma Oya, Sri Lanka: implications of spatial scales.土地利用对斯里兰卡乌马奥亚河健康状况的影响:空间尺度的意义
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Apr;189(4):192. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5863-0. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
5
The impact of cattle access on ecological water quality in streams: Examples from agricultural catchments within Ireland.牛只进入对溪流生态水质的影响:来自爱尔兰农业集水区的实例。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Mar 15;547:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.120. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
6
Identifying the spatial scale of land use that most strongly influences overall river ecosystem health score.确定对河流生态系统健康评分影响最大的土地利用空间尺度。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2188-203. doi: 10.1890/11-1792.1.
7
Multiple stressors determine river ecological status at the European scale: Towards an integrated understanding of river status deterioration.多种胁迫因素决定了欧洲河流的生态状况:对河流状况恶化的综合理解。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 May;27(9):1962-1975. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15504. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Sewage-effluent phosphorus: a greater risk to river eutrophication than agricultural phosphorus?污水排放中的磷:对河流富营养化的威胁比农业磷更大?
Sci Total Environ. 2006 May 1;360(1-3):246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
9
Compounding Effects of Agricultural Land Use and Water Use in Free-Flowing Rivers: Confounding Issues for Environmental Flows.自由流河流中农业土地利用和水利用的复合效应:环境水流的混杂问题。
Environ Manage. 2018 Mar;61(3):421-431. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0836-1. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Assessing landscape and contaminant point-sources as spatial determinants of water quality in the Vermilion River System, Ontario, Canada.评估景观和污染物点源对加拿大安大略省 Vemilion 河流系统水质的空间决定因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Oct;24(28):22587-22601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9933-1. Epub 2017 Aug 14.