Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 May;27(9):1962-1975. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15504. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
The biota of European rivers are affected by a wide range of stressors impairing water quality and hydro-morphology. Only about 40% of Europe's rivers reach 'good ecological status', a target set by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) and indicated by the biota. It is yet unknown how the different stressors in concert impact ecological status and how the relationship between stressors and status differs between river types. We linked the intensity of seven stressors to recently measured ecological status data for more than 50,000 sub-catchment units (covering almost 80% of Europe's surface area), which were distributed among 12 broad river types. Stressor data were either derived from remote sensing data (extent of urban and agricultural land use in the riparian zone) or modelled (alteration of mean annual flow and of base flow, total phosphorous load, total nitrogen load and mixture toxic pressure, a composite metric for toxic substances), while data on ecological status were taken from national statutory reporting of the second WFD River Basin Management Plans for the years 2010-2015. We used Boosted Regression Trees to link ecological status to stressor intensities. The stressors explained on average 61% of deviance in ecological status for the 12 individual river types, with all seven stressors contributing considerably to this explanation. On average, 39.4% of the deviance was explained by altered hydro-morphology (morphology: 23.2%; hydrology: 16.2%), 34.4% by nutrient enrichment and 26.2% by toxic substances. More than half of the total deviance was explained by stressor interaction, with nutrient enrichment and toxic substances interacting most frequently and strongly. Our results underline that the biota of all European river types are determined by co-occurring and interacting multiple stressors, lending support to the conclusion that fundamental management strategies at the catchment scale are required to reach the ambitious objective of good ecological status of surface waters.
欧洲河流的生物群受到广泛的压力因素的影响,这些因素会损害水质和水-地貌形态。只有大约 40%的欧洲河流达到了“良好生态状况”,这是欧洲水框架指令(WFD)设定的目标,也是生物群所指示的。目前还不清楚不同的压力因素协同作用如何影响生态状况,以及压力因素与状况之间的关系在不同河流类型之间有何不同。我们将七种压力因素的强度与最近为 50,000 多个次流域单元(覆盖欧洲表面面积的近 80%)测量的生态状况数据联系起来,这些次流域单元分布在 12 种广泛的河流类型中。压力因素数据要么来自遥感数据(河岸带城市和农业用地的范围),要么是模型化的(平均年流量和基流量的改变、总磷负荷、总氮负荷和混合毒性压力、毒性物质的综合指标),而生态状况数据则取自 2010-2015 年国家法定报告的第二次 WFD 流域管理计划。我们使用 Boosted Regression Trees 将生态状况与压力因素强度联系起来。在 12 种单独的河流类型中,压力因素平均解释了生态状况差异的 61%,所有七种压力因素都对这一解释做出了重要贡献。平均而言,39.4%的差异是由水-地貌形态改变(形态学:23.2%;水文学:16.2%)解释的,34.4%由营养物质富化解释,26.2%由毒性物质解释。超过一半的总差异是由压力因素相互作用解释的,其中营养物质富化和毒性物质相互作用最频繁和强烈。我们的研究结果强调,所有欧洲河流类型的生物群都受到共同发生和相互作用的多种压力因素的影响,这支持了在集水区尺度上需要采取基本管理策略才能实现地表水良好生态状况这一雄心勃勃目标的结论。