Besha Xi Sheng, Spencer Robert J, Bieliauskas Linas A
a 1 The Neurology Center , Washington , DC , USA.
b 2 Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Int J Neurosci. 2017 May;127(5):412-416. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1186026. Epub 2016 May 29.
This study evaluated whether using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-First Edition (PPVT-I) basal and ceiling criteria would result in similar estimates of receptive vocabulary while permitting administration of fewer test items when using the third and fourth editions of the PPVT. Data were retrospectively collected from 119 adult inpatients who completed a neuropsychological screen that included the PPVT-III or PPVT-IV, which were re-scored using PPVT-I criteria. PPVT-III/IV raw scores were not significantly different from PPVT-I raw scores. Although the difference between the PPVT-III/IV and PPVT-I standard scores was statistically significant, the difference was less than 8 points in 95% of cases. On average, 15 fewer items would be administered using the PPVT-I rules, leading to shorter administration time.
本研究评估了使用皮博迪图片词汇测验第一版（PPVT-I）的基础和上限标准，在使用PPVT第三版和第四版时，是否会在允许施测更少测试项目的情况下，得出相似的接受性词汇估计值。数据是从119名成年住院患者中回顾性收集的，这些患者完成了包括PPVT-III或PPVT-IV在内的神经心理学筛查，并使用PPVT-I标准重新计分。PPVT-III/IV原始分数与PPVT-I原始分数无显著差异。虽然PPVT-III/IV与PPVT-I标准分数之间的差异具有统计学意义，但在95%的病例中，差异小于8分。平均而言，使用PPVT-I规则施测的项目将减少15个，从而缩短施测时间。
