Leiter J C, Baker G L
Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, N.H.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 May;95(5):432-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90305-3.
We have examined the relationship between nasal resistance (Rna) and the distribution of ventilation between the nose and mouth in 10 normal breathing children and 15 children who met clinical criteria of mouth breathing. We studied Rna by posterior rhinometry. We used a face mask divided into separate oral and nasal chambers to measure oral and nasal components of ventilation. Each chamber of the mask was connected to a separate pneumotachograph. We measured oral and nasal tidal volumes (VTna) by integration of the oral and nasal flow, and calculated the total tidal volume (VTtot) by summing the oral and nasal components. The nasal fraction of ventilation (F-VTna) was calculated by dividing VTna by VTtot. We found a weak inverse correlation between Rna and F-VTna, but eight of 25 children did not breathe as one might predict on the basis of Rna, and eight of 15 children who appeared to be mouth breathers actually breathed through the nose. We administered a vasoconstricting nasal spray and a placebo nasal spray to the children and, although Rna changed significantly, we observed no change in the distribution of flow between the nose and mouth. In summary we found that clinical criteria of mouth breathing do not accurately identify children who actually breathe mainly through the mouth. Moreover Rna is only a weak predictor of the pattern of breathing; hence other factors may be important determinants of the distribution of flow between the nose and mouth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们研究了10名正常呼吸儿童和15名符合口呼吸临床标准儿童的鼻阻力(Rna)与口鼻通气分布之间的关系。我们通过后鼻测量法研究Rna。我们使用一个分为单独口腔和鼻腔腔室的面罩来测量通气的口腔和鼻腔成分。面罩的每个腔室都连接到一个单独的呼吸流速计。我们通过整合口腔和鼻腔气流来测量口腔和鼻腔潮气量(VTna),并通过将口腔和鼻腔成分相加来计算总潮气量(VTtot)。通气的鼻腔分数(F-VTna)通过将VTna除以VTtot来计算。我们发现Rna与F-VTna之间存在弱负相关,但25名儿童中有8名的呼吸情况并非根据Rna所预测的那样,并且15名看似口呼吸的儿童中有8名实际上是通过鼻子呼吸的。我们给这些儿童使用了血管收缩性鼻喷雾剂和安慰剂鼻喷雾剂,尽管Rna有显著变化,但我们观察到口鼻之间的气流分布没有变化。总之,我们发现口呼吸的临床标准不能准确识别实际主要通过口腔呼吸的儿童。此外,Rna只是呼吸模式的一个弱预测指标;因此,其他因素可能是口鼻之间气流分布的重要决定因素。(摘要截选至250字)