James D S, Lambert W E, Mermier C M, Stidley C A, Chick T W, Samet J M
Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Medical Center, Albuquerque 87131-5306, USA.
Arch Environ Health. 1997 Mar-Apr;52(2):118-23. doi: 10.1080/00039899709602874.
The route of breathing, oral or nasal, is a determinant of the doses of inhaled pollutants delivered to target sites in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. We measured partitioning of ventilation, using a divided oronasal mask during a submaximal exercise test, in 37 male and female subjects who ranged in age from 7 to 72 y. The following four patterns of breathing were evident during exercise: (1) nasal only (13.5%), nasal shifting to oronasal (40.5%), oronasal only (40.5%), and oral only (5.4%). Children (i.e., 7-16 y of age) displayed more variability than adults with respect to their patterns of ventilation with exercise. Young adults (i.e., 17-30 y of age) who initially breathed nasally with exercise switched to oral ventilation at a lower percentage of the previously measured maximum ventilation (10.8%) than older subjects (31.8%). The partitioning of ventilation between the nasal and oral routes follows complex patterns that cannot be predicted readily by the age, gender, or nasal airway resistance of the subject.
呼吸途径,无论是经口还是经鼻,都是输送到上、下呼吸道靶部位的吸入污染物剂量的一个决定因素。我们在37名年龄在7至72岁之间的男性和女性受试者进行次最大运动试验期间,使用口鼻分开的面罩测量了通气分配情况。运动期间出现了以下四种呼吸模式:(1)仅经鼻(13.5%)、从经鼻转为口鼻联合(40.5%)、仅口鼻联合(40.5%)和仅经口(5.4%)。儿童(即7至16岁)在运动时的通气模式比成年人表现出更大的变异性。最初在运动时经鼻呼吸的年轻成年人(即17至30岁)转为经口通气时的百分比(10.8%)低于老年受试者(31.8%),该百分比是之前测量的最大通气量的一部分。鼻和口途径之间的通气分配遵循复杂的模式,难以根据受试者的年龄、性别或鼻气道阻力轻易预测。