Dudek Joanna, Faress Ahmed, Bornstein Marc H, Haley David W
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0154283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154283. eCollection 2016.
The attention-grabbing quality of the infant cry is well recognized, but how the emotional valence of infant vocal signals affects adult cognition and cortical activity has heretofore been unknown. We examined the effects of two contrasting infant vocalizations (cries vs. laughs) on adult performance on a Stroop task using a cross-modal distraction paradigm in which infant distractors were vocal and targets were visual. Infant vocalizations were presented before (Experiment 1) or during each Stroop trial (Experiment 2). To evaluate the influence of infant vocalizations on cognitive control, neural responses to the Stroop task were obtained by measuring electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) in Experiment 1. Based on the previously demonstrated existence of negative arousal bias, we hypothesized that cry vocalizations would be more distracting and invoke greater conflict processing than laugh vocalizations. Similarly, we expected participants to have greater difficulty shifting attention from the vocal distractors to the target task after hearing cries vs. after hearing laughs. Behavioral results from both experiments showed a cry interference effect, in which task performance was slower with cry than with laugh distractors. Electrophysiology data further revealed that cries more than laughs reduced attention to the task (smaller P200) and increased conflict processing (larger N450), albeit differently for incongruent and congruent trials. Results from a correlation analysis showed that the amplitudes of P200 and N450 were inversely related, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between attention and conflict processing. The findings suggest that cognitive control processes contribute to an attention bias to infant signals, which is modulated in part by the valence of the infant vocalization and the demands of the cognitive task. The findings thus support the notion that infant cries elicit a negative arousal bias that is distracting; they also identify, for the first time, the neural dynamics underlying the unique influence that infant cries and laughs have on cognitive control.
婴儿哭声引人注意的特质已广为人知,但婴儿声音信号的情感效价如何影响成人认知和皮层活动,此前一直未知。我们使用一种跨模态干扰范式,研究了两种截然不同的婴儿发声(哭声与笑声)对成人在斯特鲁普任务中的表现的影响,在该范式中,婴儿干扰物是声音,目标是视觉的。婴儿发声在每次斯特鲁普试验之前(实验1)或期间(实验2)呈现。为了评估婴儿发声对认知控制的影响,在实验1中通过测量脑电图(EEG)和事件相关电位(ERP)来获取对斯特鲁普任务的神经反应。基于先前证明的负性唤醒偏差的存在,我们假设哭声发声比笑声发声更具干扰性,并引发更大的冲突处理。同样,我们预期参与者在听到哭声后比听到笑声后更难将注意力从声音干扰物转移到目标任务上。两个实验的行为结果均显示出哭声干扰效应,即与笑声干扰物相比,听到哭声时任务表现更慢。电生理学数据进一步表明,哭声比笑声更能减少对任务的注意力(较小的P200)并增加冲突处理(较大的N450),尽管在不一致和一致试验中的情况有所不同。相关分析结果表明,P200和N450的振幅呈负相关,表明注意力和冲突处理之间存在相互关系。研究结果表明,认知控制过程导致对婴儿信号的注意力偏差,这种偏差部分受婴儿发声的效价和认知任务需求的调节。因此,这些发现支持了婴儿哭声引发具有干扰性的负性唤醒偏差这一观点;它们还首次确定了婴儿哭声和笑声对认知控制产生独特影响的潜在神经动力学。