Zinchenko Artyom, Kanske Philipp, Obermeier Christian, Schröger Erich, Kotz Sonja A
International Max Planck Research School on Neuroscience of Communication (IMPRS NeuroCom), Leipzig, Germany, Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany,
Department of Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Nov;10(11):1577-87. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv050. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
Cognitive control supports goal-directed behavior by resolving conflict among opposing action tendencies. Emotion can trigger cognitive control processes, thus speeding up conflict processing when the target dimension of stimuli is emotional. However, it is unclear what role emotionality of the target dimension plays in the processing of emotional conflict (e.g. in irony). In two EEG experiments, we compared the influence of emotional valence of the target (emotional, neutral) in cognitive and emotional conflict processing. To maximally approximate real-life communication, we used audiovisual stimuli. Participants either categorized spoken vowels (cognitive conflict) or their emotional valence (emotional conflict), while visual information was congruent or incongruent. Emotional target dimension facilitated both cognitive and emotional conflict processing, as shown in a reduced reaction time conflict effect. In contrast, the N100 in the event-related potentials showed a conflict-specific reversal: the conflict effect was larger for emotional compared with neutral trials in cognitive conflict and smaller in emotional conflict. Additionally, domain-general conflict effects were observed in the P200 and N200 responses. The current findings confirm that emotions have a strong influence on cognitive and emotional conflict processing. They also highlight the complexity and heterogeneity of the interaction of emotion with different types of conflict.
认知控制通过解决相反行动倾向之间的冲突来支持目标导向行为。情绪可以触发认知控制过程,从而在刺激的目标维度是情绪性的时候加速冲突处理。然而,尚不清楚目标维度的情绪性在情绪冲突(如反讽)的处理中起什么作用。在两项脑电图实验中,我们比较了目标的情绪效价(情绪性、中性)在认知和情绪冲突处理中的影响。为了最大程度地接近现实生活中的交流,我们使用了视听刺激。参与者要么对说出的元音进行分类(认知冲突),要么对其情绪效价进行分类(情绪冲突),同时视觉信息是一致或不一致的。情绪目标维度促进了认知和情绪冲突处理,反应时冲突效应减小就表明了这一点。相比之下,事件相关电位中的N100显示出一种特定于冲突的反转:在认知冲突中,与中性试验相比,情绪试验的冲突效应更大;而在情绪冲突中则更小。此外,在P200和N200反应中观察到了领域通用的冲突效应。当前的研究结果证实,情绪对认知和情绪冲突处理有很强的影响。它们还突出了情绪与不同类型冲突相互作用的复杂性和异质性。