Chen Yi, Chen Kai, Xiao Xiaoyun, Nie Yan, Qu Shaohua, Gong Chang, Su Fengxi, Song Erwei
Department of Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 107# Yanjiang West Road, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 107# Yanjiang West Road, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Cancer. 2016 May 19;16:320. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2352-8.
A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be related to increased mortality in patients with lung, colorectal, stomach, liver, and pancreatic cancer. To date, the utility of NLR to predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been studied. The aim of our study was to determine whether the NLR is a predictor of response to NAC and to investigate the prognostic impact of the NLR on relapse-free survival (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients with breast cancer who received NAC.
We retrospectively studied patients who received NAC and subsequent surgical therapy for stage II-III invasive breast carcinoma at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between 2001 and 2010. The correlation of NLR with the pathological complete response (pCR) rate of invasive breast cancer to NAC was analyzed. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of NLR.
A total of 215 patients were eligible for analysis. The pCR rate in patients with lower pretreatment NLR (NLR < 2.06) was higher than those with higher NLR (NLR ≥ 2.06) (24.5 % vs.14.3 %, p < 0.05). Those patients with higher pretreatment NLR (NLR ≥ 2.1) had more advanced stages of cancer and higher disease-specific mortality. Through a multivariate analysis including all known predictive clinicopathologic factors, NLR ≥ 2.1 was a significant independent parameter affecting RFS (HR: 1.57, 95 % CI: 1.05-3.57, p < 0.05) and BCSS (HR: 2.21, 95 % CI: 1.01-4.39, p < 0.05). Patients with higher NLR (NLR ≥ 2.1) before treatment showed significantly lower relapse-free survival rate and breast cancer-specific survival rate than those with lower NLR (NLR <2.1) (log-rank p = 0.0242 and 0.186, respectively).
Pretreatment NLR < 2.06 is associated with pCR rate, suggesting that NLR may be an important factor predicting the response to NAC in breast cancer patients. NLR is an independent predictor of RFS and BCSS in breast cancer patients with NLR ≥ 2.1 who receive NAC. We suggest prospective studies to evaluate NLR as a simple prognostic test for breast cancer.
高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)可能与肺癌、结直肠癌、胃癌、肝癌和胰腺癌患者的死亡率增加有关。迄今为止,尚未研究NLR预测新辅助化疗(NAC)疗效的效用。我们研究的目的是确定NLR是否为NAC疗效的预测指标,并探讨NLR对接受NAC的乳腺癌患者无复发生存期(RFS)和乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)的预后影响。
我们回顾性研究了2001年至2010年间在中山大学附属孙逸仙纪念医院接受NAC及后续手术治疗的II-III期浸润性乳腺癌患者。分析了NLR与浸润性乳腺癌对NAC的病理完全缓解(pCR)率之间的相关性。采用生存分析评估NLR的预测价值。
共有215例患者符合分析条件。治疗前NLR较低(NLR < 2.06)的患者pCR率高于NLR较高(NLR ≥ 2.06)的患者(24.5%对14.3%,p < 0.05)。治疗前NLR较高(NLR ≥ 2.1)的患者癌症分期更晚,疾病特异性死亡率更高。通过包括所有已知预测性临床病理因素的多因素分析,NLR ≥ 2.1是影响RFS(风险比:1.57,95%置信区间:1.05 - 3.57,p < 0.05)和BCSS(风险比:2.21,95%置信区间:1.01 - 4.39,p < 0.05)的显著独立参数。治疗前NLR较高(NLR ≥ 2.1)的患者无复发生存率和乳腺癌特异性生存率显著低于NLR较低(NLR <2.1)的患者(对数秩检验p分别为0.0242和0.186)。
治疗前NLR < 2.06与pCR率相关,提示NLR可能是预测乳腺癌患者对NAC疗效的重要因素。NLR是接受NAC且NLR ≥ 2.1的乳腺癌患者RFS和BCSS的独立预测指标。我们建议进行前瞻性研究,以评估NLR作为乳腺癌简单预后检测指标的价值。