Ciftel Sedat, Ciftel Serpil, Klisic Aleksandra, Mercantepe Filiz
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erzurum Training and Research Hospital, 25100 Erzurum, Turkey.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Erzurum Training and Research Hospital, 25100 Erzurum, Turkey.
Life (Basel). 2024 Oct 2;14(10):1259. doi: 10.3390/life14101259.
Colorectal polyps, precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC), require precise identification for appropriate diagnosis and therapy. This study aims to investigate the differences in hematological and inflammatory markers, specifically the CALLY index, HALP score, and immuno-inflammatory indexes, between neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 758 patients aged 61.0 ± 11.8 who underwent polypectomy between June 2021 and May 2024. Patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma ( = 22) were excluded. The polyps were classified into neoplastic and nonneoplastic categories based on histopathological evaluation. The study compared the CALLY index, HALP score, and various inflammatory indexes between neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Out of 758 polyps analyzed, 514 were neoplastic, and 244 were nonneoplastic. Neoplastic polyps exhibited significantly lower CALLY and HALP scores ( < 0.05) and higher immuno-inflammatory indexes ( < 0.05) compared to nonneoplastic polyps. Dysplasia status, polyp diameter, and sigmoid colon localization were significant factors in determining neoplastic growth potential. No significant differences were observed in polyp localization in the proximal and distal colon segments or in solitary versus multiple polyps. The CALLY and HALP scores and immuno-inflammatory indexes can serve as valuable markers for distinguishing neoplastic from nonneoplastic polyps. These indexes reflect underlying inflammatory and immune responses, highlighting their potential utility in the early detection and risk stratification of colorectal polyps. Integrating these markers into clinical practice may enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient management, leading to timely interventions and better outcomes for individuals at risk of CRC.
结直肠息肉是结直肠癌(CRC)的癌前病变,需要进行精确识别以进行适当的诊断和治疗。本研究旨在调查肿瘤性息肉和非肿瘤性息肉在血液学和炎症标志物方面的差异,特别是CALLY指数、HALP评分和免疫炎症指标。对2021年6月至2024年5月期间接受息肉切除术的758例年龄为61.0±11.8岁的患者进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。排除结直肠癌患者(n = 22)。根据组织病理学评估将息肉分为肿瘤性和非肿瘤性两类。该研究比较了肿瘤性息肉和非肿瘤性息肉之间的CALLY指数、HALP评分和各种炎症指标。在分析的758个息肉中,514个为肿瘤性息肉,244个为非肿瘤性息肉。与非肿瘤性息肉相比,肿瘤性息肉的CALLY和HALP评分显著更低(P < 0.05),免疫炎症指标更高(P < 0.05)。发育异常状态、息肉直径和乙状结肠定位是决定肿瘤生长潜能的重要因素。在结肠近端和远端节段的息肉定位或单发与多发息肉方面未观察到显著差异。CALLY和HALP评分以及免疫炎症指标可作为区分肿瘤性息肉和非肿瘤性息肉的有价值标志物。这些指标反映了潜在的炎症和免疫反应,突出了它们在结直肠息肉早期检测和风险分层中的潜在效用。将这些标志物纳入临床实践可能会提高诊断准确性并改善患者管理,从而为有CRC风险个体带来及时干预和更好的结果。