Rogers Linda C, Scott Laurie, Block Jon E
Memorial Healthcare Systems, Hollywood, FL, USA.
Independent Clinical Consultant, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2016 May 9;10:15-8. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S38386. eCollection 2016.
Accurate and timely diagnosis of rupture of membranes (ROM) is imperative to allow for gestational age-specific interventions. This study compared the diagnostic performance characteristics between two methods used for the detection of ROM as measured in the same patient.
Vaginal secretions were evaluated using the conventional fern test as well as a point-of-care monoclonal/polyclonal immunoassay test (ROM Plus(®)) in 75 pregnant patients who presented to labor and delivery with complaints of leaking amniotic fluid. Both tests were compared to analytical confirmation of ROM using three external laboratory tests. Diagnostic performance characteristics were calculated including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy.
Diagnostic performance characteristics uniformly favored ROM detection using the immunoassay test compared to the fern test: sensitivity (100% vs. 77.8%), specificity (94.8% vs. 79.3%), PPV (75% vs. 36.8%), NPV (100% vs. 95.8%), and accuracy (95.5% vs. 79.1%).
The point-of-care immunoassay test provides improved diagnostic accuracy for the detection of ROM compared to fern testing. It has the potential of improving patient management decisions, thereby minimizing serious complications and perinatal morbidity.
准确及时地诊断胎膜破裂(ROM)对于采取针对孕周的干预措施至关重要。本研究比较了在同一患者中用于检测ROM的两种方法的诊断性能特征。
对75例因羊水渗漏而前来分娩的孕妇的阴道分泌物进行评估,采用传统的羊齿状结晶试验以及即时检测单克隆/多克隆免疫分析试验(ROM Plus(®))。将这两种试验与使用三种外部实验室检测方法对ROM进行的分析确认结果进行比较。计算诊断性能特征,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。
与羊齿状结晶试验相比,免疫分析试验在ROM检测方面的诊断性能特征普遍更优:敏感性(100%对77.8%)、特异性(94.8%对79.3%)、PPV(75%对36.8%)、NPV(100%对95.8%)和准确性(95.5%对79.1%)。
与羊齿状结晶试验相比,即时检测免疫分析试验在检测ROM方面具有更高的诊断准确性。它有可能改善患者管理决策,从而将严重并发症和围产期发病率降至最低。