• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国初中生学习时间的分配:习惯性反应、题目难度和时间限制

Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.

作者信息

Wang Fuyun, Qin Qiwen, Jiang Yanju

机构信息

Southwest University Chongqing, China.

Henan University Kaifeng, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 3;7:639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00639. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00639
PMID:27199865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4853600/
Abstract

The present study investigated factors influencing Chinese junior school students' study time allocation and the age difference in the effect of habitual responding. Participants were 240 junior school students (120 girls, 120 boys; aged 13-15 years) with half taking part in Experiment 1 and half in Experiment 2, and 240 young adults aged 18-23 years, (120 women and 120 men,) involved in Experiments 3a and 3b, all native Chinese speakers. In Experiments 1 and 3a, Chinese word pairs (e.g., moon-star) were presented on the screen with three items in one array. In each trial, the items were arranged from left to right, either easy, moderate, then difficult, or the reverse. Participants had either 5 s or no time limits to study the word pairs. In Experiments 2 and 3b, word pairs were ordered in a column with the easiest items either at the top or bottom position. Results showed interactions among item difficulty, item order, and time limitation in terms of effects on study time allocation of junior school students. Participants tended to learn the items in order (from left to right and from top to bottom), but the effect of item difficulty was greater than that of item order on item selection. Results indicated that agenda and habitual responding have a combined effect on study time allocation and that the contribution of agenda is greater than that of habitual responding. The effect of habitual responding on the self-paced study and recall performance of junior school students is greater than its effect on young adults, and the study time allocation of junior school students is more likely to be affected by external conditions.

摘要

本研究调查了影响中国初中生学习时间分配的因素以及习惯反应效应中的年龄差异。参与者为240名初中生(120名女生,120名男生;年龄在13 - 15岁之间),其中一半参与实验1,一半参与实验2,还有240名18 - 23岁的年轻人(120名女性和120名男性)参与实验3a和3b,他们均为以中文为母语的人。在实验1和3a中,中文单词对(如,月亮 - 星星)以三个一组呈现在屏幕上。在每次试验中,这些项目从左到右排列,要么是容易、中等、困难的顺序,要么相反。参与者有5秒时间或无时间限制来学习单词对。在实验2和3b中,单词对按列排列,最容易的项目要么在顶部要么在底部位置。结果表明,在对初中生学习时间分配的影响方面,项目难度、项目顺序和时间限制之间存在交互作用。参与者倾向于按顺序学习项目(从左到右和从上到下),但在项目选择上,项目难度的影响大于项目顺序。结果表明,议程和习惯反应对学习时间分配有综合影响,且议程的作用大于习惯反应。习惯反应对初中生自主学习和回忆表现的影响大于对年轻人的影响,初中生的学习时间分配更易受外部条件影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/9f64f33145f6/fpsyg-07-00639-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/eb79b694528c/fpsyg-07-00639-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/645875eb774e/fpsyg-07-00639-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/68a91919d851/fpsyg-07-00639-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/9f64f33145f6/fpsyg-07-00639-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/eb79b694528c/fpsyg-07-00639-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/645875eb774e/fpsyg-07-00639-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/68a91919d851/fpsyg-07-00639-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b9/4853600/9f64f33145f6/fpsyg-07-00639-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.中国初中生学习时间的分配:习惯性反应、题目难度和时间限制
Front Psychol. 2016 May 3;7:639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00639. eCollection 2016.
2
The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.基于议程和习惯的过程对学习中项目选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):899-912. doi: 10.1037/a0023064.
3
Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.习惯性阅读偏好在学习时间分配中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):1015-21. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3.
4
Metacognitive control: Shifting from habitual to agenda processes on item selection during study in elementary school children.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Dec;86(4):657-670. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12130. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?学习者在选择学习项目时,何时从习惯性过程转变为基于议程的过程?
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):416-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4.
6
Effect of individual thinking styles on item selection during study time allocation.个体思维方式对学习时间分配过程中项目选择的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2018 Apr;53(2):83-91. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12267. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
7
Age differences in item selection behaviors and subsequent memory for new foreign language vocabulary: Evidence for a region of proximal learning heuristic.年龄对新项目选择行为及随后对外语词汇记忆的影响:近端学习启发式的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Dec;35(8):1059-1072. doi: 10.1037/pag0000574. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Do Students Effectively Regulate Their Use of Self-Testing as a Function of Item Difficulty?学生是否会根据题目难度有效调节自我测试的使用?
Educ Psychol Rev. 2022;34(3):1651-1677. doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09665-6. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
9
Development of Chinese Junior High School Students' Creative Potential: Within-Person and Between-Person Effects of Student-Student Support and Need for Cognition.中国初中生创造潜力的发展:生生支持与认知需求的个体内效应和个体间效应
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8;11:552831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552831. eCollection 2020.
10
The efficacy of self-paced study in multitrial learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):851-8. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000046. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?学习者在选择学习项目时,何时从习惯性过程转变为基于议程的过程?
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):416-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4.
2
Study time allocation deficit of older adults: the role of environmental support at encoding?老年人学习时间分配不足:环境支持在编码阶段的作用?
Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):577-88. doi: 10.1037/a0026358. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
3
Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.习惯性阅读偏好在学习时间分配中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):1015-21. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3.
4
The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.基于议程和习惯的过程对学习中项目选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):899-912. doi: 10.1037/a0023064.
5
Toward an understanding of students' allocation of study time: why do they decide to mass or space their practice?理解学生学习时间分配:他们为什么决定集中或分散练习?
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jun;38(4):431-40. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.4.431.
6
Retrospective bias in test performance: Providing easy items at the beginning of a test makes students believe they did better on it.测试表现中的回溯偏差:在测试开始时提供简单的题目会使学生认为他们在测试中表现更好。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Apr;38(3):366-76. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.366.
7
Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.基于日程安排的学习时间分配规则:当日程安排优先于基于项目的监控时。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug;138(3):432-47. doi: 10.1037/a0015928.
8
Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect.对文字和数字的阅读习惯都会导致空间数字反应编码联合效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):328-31. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.328.
9
Time and cognitive load in working memory.工作记忆中的时间与认知负荷
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):570-85. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570.
10
The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading.返回抑制中的从左到右偏向是由于阅读方向。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):15-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00774.x.