• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Choosing Important Health Outcomes For Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Williamson P

机构信息

University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A435. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1118. Epub 2014 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1118
PMID:27201147
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Choosing Important Health Outcomes For Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结局：一项系统评价。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A435. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1118. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
2
Comparative-effectiveness research: does it matter?比较疗效研究：重要吗？
Clin Ther. 2013 Apr;35(4):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.AHRQ 系列论文 3：确定、选择和精炼比较有效性系统评价主题：AHRQ 和有效医疗保健计划。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
4
Which design for which question? An exploration toward a translation table for comparative effectiveness research.哪种设计针对哪种问题？对比较有效性研究翻译表的探索。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):271-9. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.24.
5
Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.系统评价、综述概述和比较效果评价：知识综合方法的探讨
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Jun;9(2):486-94. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1968.
6
Cutting-edge technology for public health workforce training in comparative effectiveness research.公共卫生劳动力培训比较效果研究的前沿技术。
Health Informatics J. 2013 Jun;19(2):101-15. doi: 10.1177/1460458212461366.
7
GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness.GRACE 原则：识别高质量的比较有效性观察性研究。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):467-71.
8
Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making.比较效果研究重点：确定临床和卫生政策决策证据中的关键差距。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):241-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990225.
9
Academic detailing can play a key role in assessing and implementing comparative effectiveness research findings.学术细化在评估和实施比较效益研究结果方面可以发挥关键作用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2206-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0817.
10
Opportunities and challenges in using studies without a control group in comparative effectiveness reviews.在比较效果评估中使用无对照组研究的机遇与挑战。
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Jun;5(2):152-61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1101. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the sentiments expressed by traumatic brain injury patients and caregivers: A qualitative study based on in-depth interviews.创伤性脑损伤患者及其照顾者表达的情绪评估：一项基于深入访谈的定性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 22;10(21):e39688. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39688. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
Introduction to "PRISMA-COSMIN for outcome measurement instruments 2024".《2024年PRISMA-COSMIN结局测量工具指南》简介
Qual Life Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):2025-2027. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03731-y.
3
Protocol for the development of a core domain set for individuals with ankle osteoarthritis.
踝关节骨关节炎患者核心领域集的制定方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06692-0.
4
The CORE-KDT study: a mixed methods protocol to establish core outcomes for refractory childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy.CORE-KDT 研究：使用生酮饮食治疗难治性儿童癫痫的混合方法研究方案，以确定核心结局。
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06629-7.
5
Standardizing Cranioplasty Outcomes Following Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for the Development of a Core Outcome Set.中风或创伤性脑损伤后颅骨修补术结果的标准化：核心结局集制定方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 17;12:e37442. doi: 10.2196/37442.
6
Developing a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review of outcomes.制定创伤性臂丛神经损伤的核心结局集：一项结局的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e044797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044797.
7
Core outcome sets in cancer and their approaches to identifying and selecting patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review.癌症核心结局集及其识别和选择患者报告结局指标的方法：一项系统综述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Sep 15;4(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00244-3.
8
Core outcomes sets for studies evaluating critical illness and patient recovery.评估危重病和患者康复的研究的核心结局集。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Oct;26(5):489-499. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000750.
9
Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set database.评价一种自动选择文章的方法，以便更及时地更新 Comet 核心结局集数据库。
Database (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;2019. doi: 10.1093/database/baz109.
10
Harmonisation of Outcome Parameters and Evaluation (HOPE) for actinic keratosis: protocol for the development of a core outcome set.光化性角化病结局参数和评估的协调（HOPE）：制定核心结局集的方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3696-6.