• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风或创伤性脑损伤后颅骨修补术结果的标准化:核心结局集制定方案

Standardizing Cranioplasty Outcomes Following Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for the Development of a Core Outcome Set.

作者信息

Mee Harry, Castaño-Leon Ana M, Timofeev Ivan, Adeleye Amos, Devi Bhagavatula Indira, Marklund Niklas, Muehlschlegel Susanne, Bond Katie, Clement Clare, Grieve Kirsty, Owen Nicola, Whiting Gemma, Turner Carole, Rubiano Escobar Andres Mariano, Shukla Dhaval, Paul Maria, Allanson Judith, Pomeroy Valerie, Viaroli Edoardo, Warburton Elizabeth, Wells Adam, Hawryluk Gregory, Helmy Adel, Anwar Fahim, Honeybul Stephen, Hutchinson Peter, Kolias Angelos

机构信息

Division of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 17;12:e37442. doi: 10.2196/37442.

DOI:
10.2196/37442
PMID:35759752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10152332/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Core outcome sets (COSs) are important and necessary as they help standardize reporting in research studies. Cranioplasty following traumatic brain injury (TBI) or stroke is becoming increasingly common, leading to an ever-growing clinical and research interest, especially regarding the optimal material, cost-effectiveness, and timing of cranioplasty concerning neurological recovery and complications. Consequently, heterogeneous reporting of outcomes from such diverse studies has led to limited meta-analysis ability and an ongoing risk of outcome reporting bias. This study aims to define a standardized COS for reporting in all future TBI and stroke cranioplasty studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study has four aims: (1) undertake a systematic review to collate the most current outcome measures used within the cranioplasty literature; (2) undertake a qualitative study to understand better the views of clinicians, patients' relatives, and allied health professionals regarding clinical outcomes following cranioplasty; (3) undertake a Delphi survey as part of the process of gaining consensus for the COS; and (4) finalize consensus through a consensus meeting resulting in the COS.

METHODS

An international steering committee has been formed to guide the development of the COS. In addition, recommendations from other clinical initiatives such as COMET (Core Outcomes and Effectiveness Trials) and OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) have been adhered to. Phase 1 is data collection through a systematic review and qualitative study. Phase 2 is the COS development through a Delphi survey and consensus meetings with consensus definitions decided and agreed upon before the Delphi survey begins to avoid bias.

RESULTS

Phase 1 started at the end of 2019, following ethical approval in December 2019, and the project completion date is planned for the end of 2022 or beginning of 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

This study should result in a consensus on a COS for cranioplasty, following TBI or stroke, to help standardize outcome reporting for future studies, which can be applied to future research and clinical services, help align future studies, build an increased understanding of cranioplasty and its impact on a patient's function and recovery, and help standardize the evidence base.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/37442.

摘要

背景

核心结局集(COSs)很重要且必要,因为它们有助于规范研究报告。创伤性脑损伤(TBI)或中风后的颅骨修补术越来越普遍,引发了越来越多的临床和研究兴趣,特别是关于颅骨修补术的最佳材料、成本效益以及与神经功能恢复和并发症相关的手术时机。因此,这些不同研究结果的异质性报告导致荟萃分析能力有限,且存在结果报告偏倚的持续风险。本研究旨在定义一个标准化的核心结局集,用于未来所有TBI和中风颅骨修补术研究的报告。

目的

本研究有四个目标:(1)进行系统评价,以整理颅骨修补术文献中使用的最新结局指标;(2)进行定性研究,以更好地了解临床医生、患者亲属和专职医疗人员对颅骨修补术后临床结局的看法;(3)作为核心结局集达成共识过程的一部分,进行德尔菲调查;(4)通过共识会议最终确定共识,形成核心结局集。

方法

已成立一个国际指导委员会来指导核心结局集的制定。此外,还遵循了其他临床倡议(如COMET(核心结局与有效性试验)和OMERACT(风湿病学结局指标))的建议。第1阶段是通过系统评价和定性研究收集数据。第2阶段是通过德尔菲调查和共识会议来制定核心结局集,在德尔菲调查开始前确定并商定共识定义以避免偏倚。

结果

第1阶段于2019年底开始,2019年12月获得伦理批准,项目计划于2022年底或2023年初完成。

结论

本研究应就TBI或中风后颅骨修补术的核心结局集达成共识,以帮助规范未来研究的结局报告,可应用于未来的研究和临床服务,有助于统一未来研究,增进对颅骨修补术及其对患者功能和恢复影响的理解,并有助于规范证据基础。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/37442

相似文献

1
Standardizing Cranioplasty Outcomes Following Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for the Development of a Core Outcome Set.中风或创伤性脑损伤后颅骨修补术结果的标准化:核心结局集制定方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 17;12:e37442. doi: 10.2196/37442.
2
Towards a core outcome set for cranioplasty following traumatic brain injury and stroke 'A systematic review of reported outcomes'.创伤性脑损伤和中风后颅骨修补术核心结局集的研究:对已报道结局的系统评价
Brain Spine. 2023 May 15;3:101735. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101735. eCollection 2023.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set.非特异性下腰痛临床试验的核心结局集:核心领域集开发的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 26;15:511. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-511.
6
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.制定鳞状细胞癌临床试验的核心结局指标集:文献系统评价及采用德尔菲法确定核心结局指标集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jul 12;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2.
7
Developing Core Outcome Sets (COS) and Core Outcome Measures Sets (COMS) in Cosmetic Gynecological Interventions: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.制定妇科美容干预核心结局集(COS)和核心结局测量集(COMS):一项开发与可用性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 15;10(11):e28032. doi: 10.2196/28032.
8
Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.用于评估治疗双胎输血综合征的研究的核心结局集。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):255-261. doi: 10.1002/uog.20183. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
9
Vitiligo International Task force for an Agreed List of core data (VITAL): study protocol of a vitiligo core outcome set (COS) and contextual factors for clinical trials, registries, and clinical practice.白癜风国际工作组的一项核心数据共识清单(VITAL):一项白癜风核心结局集(COS)以及临床试验、注册和临床实践中相关因素的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 23;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06497-1.
10
COS-Speech: protocol to develop a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke for use in clinical practice and research.COS-Speech:为用于临床实践和研究的脑卒中后构音障碍制定核心结局集的方案。
Trials. 2023 Jan 25;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06958-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A core outcome set for cranioplasty following stroke or traumatic brain injury - The COAST study.中风或创伤性脑损伤后颅骨修补术的核心结局集——COAST研究。
Brain Spine. 2025 Jun 1;5:104288. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104288. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcome after decompressive craniectomy in older adults after traumatic brain injury.老年创伤性脑损伤患者减压性颅骨切除术后的结局
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 8;11:1422040. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1422040. eCollection 2024.
3
Analysis of outcome reporting in common peroneal neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty.国际创伤性颅骨修补术后共识会议的共识声明。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Feb;163(2):423-440. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04663-5. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review.颅骨修补术改善神经功能结局的时机:系统评价。
Brain Behav. 2018 Nov;8(11):e01106. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1106. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
3
Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer.
常见腓总神经病变研究中结局报告的分析:文献系统综述。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Sep;165(9):2597-2604. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05744-x. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
4
Developing a Core Outcome Set for Assessing Clinical Safety Outcomes of Prostate Cancer in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.制定用于评估中医药治疗前列腺癌临床试验临床安全性结局的核心结局集:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 7;12:e46794. doi: 10.2196/46794.
5
Impact of Cranioplasty on Rehabilitation Course of Patients with Traumatic or Hemorrhagic Brain Injury.颅骨修补术对创伤性或出血性脑损伤患者康复进程的影响
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 31;13(1):80. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13010080.
肛门癌核心结局研究指标(CORMAC):关于制定肛门癌核心结局集的系统评价、定性访谈和德尔菲调查方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e018726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018726.
4
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.核心结局集-开发标准:COS-STAD建议
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 16;14(11):e1002447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447. eCollection 2017 Nov.
5
Early Cranioplasty is Associated with Greater Neurological Improvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.早期颅骨修补术与更大的神经改善相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Mar 1;82(3):278-288. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx182.
6
Developing a Core Set of Outcome Measures for Behçet Disease: Report from OMERACT 2016.开发贝赫切特病结局指标核心集:来自 OMERACT 2016 的报告。
J Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;44(11):1750-1753. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161352. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
7
Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.外伤性颅内高压的颅骨切除术
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2403-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1613479.
8
Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development.在核心结局和信息集开发过程中,针对德尔菲调查中仅同行或多利益相关者群体反馈进行的三项嵌套随机对照试验。
Trials. 2016 Aug 17;17(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1479-x.
9
Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.颅骨修补术后并发症及其与手术时机的关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Nov;33:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Choosing Important Health Outcomes For Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review.为比较效果研究选择重要的健康结局:一项系统评价。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A435. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1118. Epub 2014 Oct 26.