Marshall J G
Faculty of Library and Information Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Jan;77(1):48-55.
This paper examines end-user, online searching using data from a questionnaire mailed to 150 Canadian health professionals in practice settings. The response rate was 83% (n = 124). The data provide a demographic profile of early adopters of end-user searching in the health care community. Positive correlations with the user's level of implementation of end-user searching were found for the following variables: amount of time spent in research activities, amount of system training received, and use of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). There was a negative association between the amount of time spent in patient care and implementation level. General practitioners and family physicians had lower implementation levels than physicians in other specialties. Successful implementers were more likely to be computer literate and to place a high value on formal information sources such as books, journals, and libraries. Health professionals using so-called "user-friendly" or menu-based software had lower levels of personal commitment to using online databases, as measured by a combination of continuance of use, willingness to pay personally, type of recommendations made to colleagues, and hardware ownership.
本文利用邮寄给150名加拿大实际工作中的卫生专业人员的调查问卷数据,研究终端用户的在线搜索情况。回复率为83%(n = 124)。这些数据提供了医疗保健社区中终端用户搜索早期采用者的人口统计学概况。发现以下变量与终端用户搜索的用户实施水平呈正相关:在研究活动中花费的时间、接受的系统培训量以及医学主题词(MeSH)的使用。在患者护理中花费的时间与实施水平之间存在负相关。全科医生和家庭医生的实施水平低于其他专科的医生。成功的实施者更有可能精通计算机,并高度重视书籍、期刊和图书馆等正规信息来源。使用所谓“用户友好”或基于菜单的软件的卫生专业人员,通过使用持续性、个人付费意愿、向同事提供的推荐类型以及硬件拥有情况等综合指标衡量,对使用在线数据库的个人投入水平较低。