Reed Grant W, Raeisi-Giglou Pejman, Kafa Rami, Malik Umair, Salehi Negar, Shishehbor Mehdi H
Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 20;5(5):e003168. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003168.
The significance of hospital readmission after endovascular therapy for critical limb ischemia (CLI) is not well established. We sought to investigate the incidence, timing, and causes of readmissions after endovascular therapy for CLI and whether readmission is associated with major adverse limb events (MALE) or mortality.
This was a retrospective study of 252 patients treated with endovascular therapy for CLI. During median follow-up of 381 days (interquartile range [IQR], 115-718), 140 (56%) were readmitted, with median time to readmission of 83 days (IQR, 33-190). Readmission within 30 days occurred in 14% of patients (n=35; 25% of readmissions). Most readmissions occurred between 30 and 180 days (n=67; 48% of readmissions). The most frequent reason for readmission was unhealed wounds (n=63; 45% of readmissions). Independent predictors of readmission by Cox proportional hazards analysis were unhealed wounds, presence of multiple wounds, age ≥70, female sex, hemodialysis, and history of heart failure (P<0.05 for each). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, readmission was greatest in patients with unhealed wounds, followed by patients who never had a wound, and lowest in patients whose wounds completely healed (P<0.0001 overall, and P<0.01 between groups). After multivariable adjustment, readmission remained an independent predictor of composite MALE (major amputation, bypass, or endarterectomy) or mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.5; P=0.002).
Most readmissions occur 30 and 180 days after endovascular therapy for nonprocedural reasons. Unhealed wounds are an independent risk factor for readmission. Readmission is associated with increased MALE and mortality after endovascular therapy for CLI.
血管内治疗严重肢体缺血(CLI)后再次入院的意义尚未明确。我们旨在调查CLI血管内治疗后再次入院的发生率、时间及原因,以及再次入院是否与主要肢体不良事件(MALE)或死亡率相关。
这是一项对252例接受CLI血管内治疗患者的回顾性研究。在中位随访381天(四分位间距[IQR],115 - 718)期间,140例(56%)患者再次入院,再次入院的中位时间为83天(IQR,33 - 190)。30天内再次入院的患者占14%(n = 35;占再次入院患者的25%)。大多数再次入院发生在30至180天之间(n = 67;占再次入院患者的48%)。再次入院最常见的原因是伤口未愈合(n = 63;占再次入院患者的45%)。通过Cox比例风险分析,再次入院的独立预测因素为伤口未愈合、存在多处伤口、年龄≥70岁、女性、血液透析及心力衰竭病史(每项P<0.05)。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,伤口未愈合的患者再次入院率最高,其次是从未有过伤口的患者,伤口完全愈合的患者再次入院率最低(总体P<0.0001,组间P<0.01)。多变量调整后,再次入院仍是复合MALE(大截肢、搭桥或动脉内膜切除术)或死亡率的独立预测因素(调整后风险比,3.1;95%CI,1.5 - 6.5;P = 0.002)。
大多数再次入院发生在血管内治疗后30至180天,原因与手术无关。伤口未愈合是再次入院的独立危险因素。CLI血管内治疗后再次入院与MALE增加及死亡率升高相关。